These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6616344)

  • 1. Suedohomofoan effects in visual word recognition: evidence for phonological processing.
    Besner D; Davelaar E
    Can J Psychol; 1983 Jun; 37(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 6616344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition.
    Humphreys GW; Evett LJ; Taylor DE
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Nov; 10(6):576-90. PubMed ID: 7162419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The strong, the weak, and the first: The impact of phonological stress on processing of orthographic errors in silent reading.
    Kriukova O; Mani N
    Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 1636():208-218. PubMed ID: 26790350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthographic vs. phonological irregularity in lexical decision.
    Parkin AJ; Underwood G
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 6633253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.
    Seidenberg MS
    Cognition; 1985 Feb; 19(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 4039640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Visual and phonological access to the mental lexicon].
    Gfroerer S; Günther H; Weiss L
    Phonetica; 1984; 41(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 6739553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further explorations of the consistency effect in word and nonword pronunciation.
    Stanhope N; Parkin AJ
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Mar; 15(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 3683181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition.
    Frost R; Katz L
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 2725267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonological coding in good and poor readers.
    Briggs P; Underwood G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1982 Aug; 34(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 7119682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference.
    Lupker SJ
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 7172126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological activation during visual word recognition in deaf and hearing children.
    Ormel E; Hermans D; Knoors H; Hendriks A; Verhoeven L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):801-20. PubMed ID: 20689045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching.
    Kramer AF; Donchin E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Jan; 13(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 2949054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric differences for orthographic and phonological processing.
    Crossman DL; Polich J
    Brain Lang; 1988 Nov; 35(2):301-12. PubMed ID: 3208075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word context effects on letter recognition.
    Jacewicz MM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 1):935-42. PubMed ID: 482048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errors in proofreading: evidence for the use of word shape in word recognition.
    Monk AF; Hulme C
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Jan; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 6855555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonological coding in word reading: evidence from hearing and deaf readers.
    Hanson VL; Fowler CA
    Mem Cognit; 1987 May; 15(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 3600259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria.
    Waters GS; Seidenberg MS
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Nov; 13(6):557-72. PubMed ID: 3831712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visually-presented letter strings typically are encoded phonologically: some converging evidence.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1987 Apr; 114(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3585296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
    Seidenberg MS; McClelland JL
    Psychol Rev; 1989 Oct; 96(4):523-68. PubMed ID: 2798649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.