These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6616820)
1. Comparison of a logistic and a mass-action curve for radioimmunoassay data. Raab GM Clin Chem; 1983 Oct; 29(10):1757-61. PubMed ID: 6616820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a logistic and a mass-action curve for radioimmunoassay. Wilkins TA Clin Chem; 1984 Apr; 30(4):585. PubMed ID: 6705211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Response curves for radioimmunoassay. Finney DJ Clin Chem; 1983 Oct; 29(10):1762-6. PubMed ID: 6616821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model-independent quantification of measurement error: empirical estimation of discrete variance function profiles based on standard curves. Straume M; Veldhuis JD; Johnson ML Methods Enzymol; 1994; 240():121-50. PubMed ID: 7823828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A practical model for steroid hormone radioimmunoassays. Seaton B; Lusty J; Watson J J Steroid Biochem; 1976; 7(6-7):511-6. PubMed ID: 966762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Calculation of radioimmunoassay standard curves. Naus AJ; Kuppens PS; Borst A Clin Chem; 1977 Sep; 23(9):1624-7. PubMed ID: 890904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality control of radioimmunoassay of hormones in reproductive physiology. Hall PE J Steroid Biochem; 1979 Jul; 11(1A):113-6. PubMed ID: 491582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple method for the interpolation of radioimmunoassay data. England P; Cain O Clin Chim Acta; 1976 Oct; 72(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 788956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of four different algorithms for the calculation of radioimmunoassay standard curves. Marschner I; Herndl R; Scriba PC J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1980 Feb; 18(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 7373234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An improved processing of radioimmunoassay data by means of a desk-top calculator. (1) Comparison of regression procedures applied to selected kinds of radioimmunoassay. Ichihara K; Yamamoto Y; Kumahara Y; Miyai K Clin Chim Acta; 1977 Sep; 79(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 890969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer program for evaluation, physicochemical characterization and optimization of competitive protein binding assays: comparison of four curve-fitting models in peptide and steroid radioimmunoassays. Schöneshöfer M Clin Chim Acta; 1977 Jun; 77(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 890938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choosing near-linear parameters in the four-parameter logistic model for radioligand and related assays. Ratkowsky DA; Reedy TJ Biometrics; 1986 Sep; 42(3):575-82. PubMed ID: 3567290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between gonadotropin radioimmunoassays with the use of 48 hour and six-day incubation methods. Kosasa TS; Thompson IE; Byer WB; Taymor ML Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 1247046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Principles and modifications of radioimmunological assays of protein hormones. Addison GM; Hales CN; Miles LE Horm Metab Res; 1971; 3():Suppl 3:22-5. PubMed ID: 4342418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of outlying standard points on curve fitting in radioimmunoassay. Hawker FJ; Challand GS Clin Chem; 1981 Jan; 27(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 7449095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]