These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6617311)

  • 1. Information processed from brief visual displays by learning-disabled boys.
    Blackwell SL; McIntyre CW; Murray ME
    Child Dev; 1983 Aug; 54(4):927-40. PubMed ID: 6617311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Span of apprehension in hyperactive boys.
    Denton CL; McIntyre CW
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1978 Mar; 6(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 632456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory in learning disability subgroups.
    Swanson HL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Aug; 56(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8366327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of retroactive and proactive interference on learning and memory in old and young rats.
    Winocur G
    Dev Psychobiol; 1984 Sep; 17(5):537-45. PubMed ID: 6479455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory development in learning disabled children: evidence from nonverbal tasks.
    Swanson HL
    J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 100(1st Half):9-12. PubMed ID: 690952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual recognition memory in specific learning-disabled children.
    Santiago HC; Matos I
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Oct; 65(10):690-700. PubMed ID: 7995892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus overselectivity in learning disabled children.
    Bailey SL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1981; 14(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 7298536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of noise distractibility on the spans of apprehension of hyperactive boys.
    McIntyre CW; Blackwell SL; Denton CL
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1978 Dec; 6(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 730969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studies of visual information processing in schizophrenic children.
    Asarnow RF; Sherman T
    Child Dev; 1984 Feb; 55(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 6705626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrocortical frequencies in hyperactive, learning-disabled, mixed, and normal children.
    Dykman RA; Holcomb PJ; Oglesby DM; Ackerman PT
    Biol Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 17(6):675-85. PubMed ID: 7104419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iconic store readout of mildly mentally retarded and nonretarded individuals.
    Mosley JL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1981 Jul; 86(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 7270589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.
    Bonanno GA; Stillings NA
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 3799851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hyperactivity and incidental memory: evidence for attentional diffusion.
    Ceci SJ; Tishman J
    Child Dev; 1984 Dec; 55(6):2192-203. PubMed ID: 6525891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Picture recognition without picture identification: a method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition.
    Langley MM; Cleary AM; Kostic BN; Woods JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17434434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of the similarity and dissimilarity between familiarization and test objects on recognition memory in infants following unimodal and bimodal familiarization.
    Rolfe SA; Day RH
    Child Dev; 1981; 52(4):1308-12. PubMed ID: 7318525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coding processes in normal and learning-disabled children: evidence for modality-specific pathways to the cognitive system.
    Ceci SJ; Lea SE; Ringstrom MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Nov; 6(6):785-97. PubMed ID: 7441190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial report, visual matching, and search as a function of cue-delay.
    Schulz T
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1989; 141(3):213-35. PubMed ID: 2631635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of encoding and retrieval strategies on the recall of learning disabled and normal children.
    Moe GL; Harris JD
    J Gen Psychol; 1983 Oct; 109(2d Half):233-46. PubMed ID: 6644279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory-successive selective attention for learning disabled and normal boys.
    Willis WG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):496-8. PubMed ID: 4069914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in multi-task response strategies.
    Damos D; Smist T
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 Dec; 53(12):1177-81. PubMed ID: 7159337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.