These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6618037)

  • 1. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A; Harford E; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simplified real ear technique for verifying the maximum output of a hearing aid.
    Harford E; Leijon A; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 6862114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probe tube microphone measures of loudness discomfort levels in children.
    Stuart A; Durieux-Smith A; Stenstrom R
    Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 2065839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid saturation and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 1531242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and maximum power output in subjects recently fitted with NHS hearing aids.
    Munro KJ; Nind L; Cleaver VC
    Br J Audiol; 1996 Aug; 30(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 8879692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Shera CA; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL.
    Saunders GH; Morgan DE
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Sep; 42(6):319-26. PubMed ID: 14570239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones.
    Frank T; Richards WD
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 1916048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
    Putterman DB; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A probe earmold system for measuring eardrum SPL under hearing-aid conditions.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 6719011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.
    Withnell RH; Jeng PS; Waldvogel K; Morgenstein K; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1605-11. PubMed ID: 19275318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90.
    Hawkins DB; Walden BE; Montgomery A; Prosek RA
    Ear Hear; 1987 Jun; 8(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 3609512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matching commercial hearing aids to prescriptive gain and maximum output requirements.
    Punch JL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Feb; 52(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 3807348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 1600219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.