These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6618037)

  • 21. Validity and repeatability of level-independent HL to SPL transforms.
    Scollie SD; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE; Jenstad LM
    Ear Hear; 1998 Oct; 19(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 9796649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
    Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The reliability of Békésy sweep audiometry recording and effects of the earphone position.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1980; 366():99-112. PubMed ID: 6255732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The present state of hearing-aid use in three schools for the hearing impaired in Britain.
    Nakanishi Y
    Br J Audiol; 1981 May; 15(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 7225646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stability of Audiometric Thresholds for Children with Hearing Aids Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Implications for Safety.
    McCreery R; Walker E; Spratford M; Kirby B; Oleson J; Brennan M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):252-263. PubMed ID: 26967365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of an in-situ output probe-microphone method for hearing aid fitting verification.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2307301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements.
    Mason D; Popelka GR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 3724114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of dual-microphone in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Valente M; Schuchman G; Potts LG; Beck LB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):181-9. PubMed ID: 10783921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for Sennheiser HDA 280 supra-aural audiometric earphones in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8000 Hz.
    Poulsen T; Oakley S
    Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 19842802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In situ Hearing Tests for the Purpose of a Self-Fit Hearing Aid.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28434002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Hoover BM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical ear canal probe tube measurements.
    Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):74S-81S. PubMed ID: 3678654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The National Acoustic Laboratories' procedure for selecting the saturation sound pressure level of hearing aids: experimental validation.
    Storey L; Dillon H; Yeend I; Wigney D
    Ear Hear; 1998 Aug; 19(4):267-79. PubMed ID: 9728722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps.
    Margolis RH; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):440-7. PubMed ID: 21668325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing aid prescription rules using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G; Backelin L
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 6523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Signal delivery/real ear measurement system for hearing aid selection and fitting.
    Zelisko DL; Seewald RC; Gagné JP
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 1342584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of asymptotic threshold shift caused by hearing aid use.
    Macrae JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 37(6):1450-8. PubMed ID: 7877300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.