98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6618826)
21. Computer-based methods for measuring joint space and estimating erosion volume in the finger and wrist joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Sharp JT; Gardner JC; Bennett EM
Arthritis Rheum; 2000 Jun; 43(6):1378-86. PubMed ID: 10857798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J
Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modified inverse square sensitometry for the determination of the characteristic curve of radiographic screen/film systems.
Yoshida A; Hiraki Y; Ohkawa Y; Yamada T; Hashimoto K; Aono K
Acta Med Okayama; 1986 Feb; 40(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3962729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications.
Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K
Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
Maurer HJ; Goos F
Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Information yield: a comparison of Kodak T-Mat G, Ortho L and RP X-Omat films.
Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Peterson MG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2599233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
Prokop M; Galanski M; Oestmann JW; von Falkenhausen U; Rosenthal H; Reimer P; Nischelsky J; Reichelt S
Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ROC and contrast detail image evaluation tests compared.
Kelsey CA; Moseley RD; Garcia JF; Mettler FA; Parker TW; Juhl JH
Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):629-31. PubMed ID: 3969463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging.
Lundeen RC; McDavid WD; Barnwell GM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Dec; 66(6):734-45. PubMed ID: 3205558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microfocal radiographic examination of erosions in the wrist and hand of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Buckland-Wright JC
Ann Rheum Dis; 1984 Apr; 43(2):160-71. PubMed ID: 6712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Quantitative evaluation of film-screen combinations for x-ray diagnosis].
Bronder T; Heinze-Assmann R
Phys Med Biol; 1988 May; 33(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 3399512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A clinical comparison of image quality and patient exposure reduction in panoramic radiography with heavy metal filtration.
Kapa SF; Tyndall DA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 2740096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
