These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy. Chan PT; Brandell RA; Goldstein M BJU Int; 2005 Sep; 96(4):598-601. PubMed ID: 16104917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Excretory azoospermia: contribution of exploratory and curative surgery. Apropos of a follow-up of 33 patients]. Courtade M; Daudin M; Mansat A; Lagorce C; Bujan L; Parinaud J; Caratero C; Pontonnier F J Urol (Paris); 1996; 102(5-6):205-11. PubMed ID: 9833025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Experimental and clinical use of microsurgery in urology]. Oesterwitz H; Althaus P Z Urol Nephrol; 1981 Dec; 74(12):853-64. PubMed ID: 7041476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: role of epididymis in sperm maturation. Silber SJ Hum Reprod; 1989 Apr; 4(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 2715305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Reconstructive microsurgery of the vas deferens. Experimental study of suture materials]. Lottmann H; Leandri J; Chaumette MT; Chopin D Ann Urol (Paris); 1985; 19(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 2990319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Development and use of surgical procedures to bypass selected regions of the mammalian epididymis: effects on sperm maturation. Temple-Smith PD; Zheng SS; Kadioglu T; Southwick GJ J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1998; 53():183-95. PubMed ID: 10645277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Pregnancy and live birth rates after microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for azoospermic patients with epididymal obstruction. Peng J; Zhang Z; Yuan Y; Cui W; Song W Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):284-289. PubMed ID: 28057874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [The microsurgical reconstruction of the seminal pathways]. Wagenknecht LV; Ortensi A G Chir; 1991; 12(11-12):537-44. PubMed ID: 1805906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. [Factors affecting the results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy]. Peng J; Yuan YM; Zhang ZC; Gao B; Song WD; Xin ZC; Guo YL; Jin J Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Aug; 43(4):562-4. PubMed ID: 21844967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats. McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Obstructive azoospermia of unknown origin: sites of obstruction and surgical outcomes. Matsuda T; Horii Y; Yoshida O J Urol; 1994 Jun; 151(6):1543-6. PubMed ID: 8189567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a comparison between the end-to-side anastomosis and the invagination technique. Shekarriz M; Pomer S Urol Res; 1991; 19(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 1949427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The pull-through technique for the advancement of the unfolded epididymal tubule and the tubulo-deferential telescopic reconstruction. Tritto G Ann Urol (Paris); 1989; 23(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 2589829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Problems unique to microsurgical epididymovasostomy. Comparison of four techniques in a laboratory rat model with review of the literature. Stefanović KB; Buncke HJ; Clark SA Int Urol Nephrol; 1993; 25(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8365850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]