These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6621001)

  • 1. Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 Feb; 48(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 6621001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 7087416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise.
    Bilger RC; Nuetzel JM; Rabinowitz WM; Rzeczkowski C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 6717005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra- and inter-session test, retest reliability of the Words-in-Noise (WIN) test.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007; 18(10):813-25. PubMed ID: 18496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest variability in testing hearing of speech.
    Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Johnson RL
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 511653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.
    Beattie RC; Raffin MJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D; Bazo D
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of two measures of speech recognition in elderly people.
    Cokely CG; Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):654-60. PubMed ID: 1608257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Beattie RC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 Feb; 54(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 2915523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three experiments on the California Consonant Test.
    Schwartz DM; Surr RK
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Feb; 44(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 423556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Killion MC; Niquette PA; Gudmundsen GI; Revit LJ; Banerjee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. PubMed ID: 15532670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some effects of spectral shaping on recognition of speech by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kamm CA; Dirks DD; Carterette EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 May; 71(5):1211-24. PubMed ID: 7085993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability issues with the Synthetic Sentence Identification test.
    Pugh KC; Crandell CC; Griffiths SK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Jun; 9(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 9644621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].
    Memmeler T; Schönweiler R; Wollenberg B; Löhler J
    HNO; 2019 Feb; 67(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 30519714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
    Nabelek AK; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.