These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6622042)
1. On the use of matrices for the mean value of refractive errors. Keating MP Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1983; 3(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 6622042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Checking the small things. Brown MD J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Jul; 68(7):405-6. PubMed ID: 9248243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The new visual optics. Adams AJ Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 83(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 16772889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Refractive errors and amblyopia in children entering school: Shahrood, Iran. Jamali P; Fotouhi A; Hashemi H; Younesian M; Jafari A Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 19289975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of refractive techniques. McKendrick AM; Brennan NA J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Dec; 66(12):758-65. PubMed ID: 8557954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Traditional versus computer-assisted refraction: "which is better?". Borish IM; Catania LJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):749-56. PubMed ID: 9635380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Control of the myopic shift in modified Badal optometer. Kedzia B; Twardowski P Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jan; 18(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 9666911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of corneal pigmented arc and factors associated with its appearance in orthokeratology. Cho P; Cheung SW; Mountford J; Chui WS Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Nov; 25(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 16343123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Basic manual lensometry: a guide for measuring distance and near glasses. Garber N J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 2000; 19(4):184-91; quiz 192-3. PubMed ID: 11309995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of habitual refractive errors and anisometropia among Dutch schoolchildren and hospital employees. Hendricks TJ; de Brabander J; Vankan-Hendricks MH; van der Horst FG; Hendrikse F; Knottnerus JA Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 87(5):538-43. PubMed ID: 19416112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grading contact lens complications under time constraints. Efron N; McCubbin S Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 84(12):1082-6. PubMed ID: 18091306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power vectors versus power matrices, and the mathematical nature of dioptric power. Harris WF Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Nov; 84(11):1060-3. PubMed ID: 18043426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The practice of optometry: National Board of Examiners in Optometry survey of optometric patients. Soroka M; Krumholz D; Bennett A; Optometry; 2006 Sep; 77(9):427-37. PubMed ID: 16939884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone contributions to signals for accommodation and the relationship to refractive error. Rucker FJ; Kruger PB Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3079-89. PubMed ID: 16782165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Measuring the level of tonic accomodation as a function of wavelength]. Dechriste S; Simonet P J Fr Ophtalmol; 1995; 18(6-7):439-46. PubMed ID: 7560785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orthokeratology: part I historical perspective. Coon LJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Mar; 53(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 7042802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidelines for prescribing optical correction in children. Wutthiphan S J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Nov; 88 Suppl 9():S163-9. PubMed ID: 16681071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]