These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6623548)

  • 21. Extent of corneal injury as a biomarker for hazard assessment and the development of alternative models to the Draize rabbit eye test.
    Jester JV
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2006; 25(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 16702053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [In vitro alternatives to Draize eye irritation test].
    Zhou J; Yang M; Yang X; He X
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2004 Jul; 33(4):515-7. PubMed ID: 15461295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improvement of the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay as an in vitro alternative to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test.
    Verstraelen S; Jacobs A; De Wever B; Vanparys P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Jun; 27(4):1298-311. PubMed ID: 23501624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of low-volume, Draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. I. Hydroalcoholic formulations.
    Gettings SD; Lordo RA; Demetrulias J; Feder PI; Hintze KL
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Aug; 34(8):737-49. PubMed ID: 8883476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays.
    Martinez V; Corsini E; Mitjans M; Pinazo A; Vinardell MP
    Toxicol Lett; 2006 Jul; 164(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16472949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The in vitro assessment of eye irritancy using isolated eyes.
    Price JB; Andrews IJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):313-5. PubMed ID: 4040083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The status of eye irritancy testing: a regulatory perspective.
    Wilcox NL
    Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1992; 9(3-4):259-71. PubMed ID: 1301785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Further verification of an in vitro tier system for the identification of cosmetic ingredients that are not ocular irritants.
    Hagino S; Okazaki Y; Kitagaki M; Itagaki H
    Altern Lab Anim; 2010 May; 38(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 20507185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reducing the number of rabbits in the low-volume eye test.
    Bruner LH; Parker RD; Bruce RD
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1992 Oct; 19(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 1459364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Opacity of bovine cornea in vitro induced by surfactants and industrial chemicals compared with ocular irritancy in vivo.
    Muir CK
    Toxicol Lett; 1985; 24(2-3):157-62. PubMed ID: 3983968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of bootstrap resampling to assess the variability of Draize tissue scores.
    Worth AP; Cronin MT
    Altern Lab Anim; 2001; 29(5):557-73. PubMed ID: 11604099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Establishment of a new in vitro test method for evaluation of eye irritancy using a reconstructed human corneal epithelial model, LabCyte CORNEA-MODEL.
    Katoh M; Hamajima F; Ogasawara T; Hata K
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Dec; 27(8):2184-92. PubMed ID: 23999412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells.
    Takahashi Y; Koike M; Honda H; Ito Y; Sakaguchi H; Suzuki H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Apr; 22(3):760-70. PubMed ID: 18248950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Draize eye test.
    Wilhelmus KR
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2001; 45(6):493-515. PubMed ID: 11425356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes.
    Kolle SN; Rey Moreno MC; Mayer W; van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Jul; 43(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 26256396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a human corneal epithelial cell line as an in vitro model for assessing ocular irritation.
    Kruszewski FH; Walker TL; DiPasquale LC
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1997 Apr; 36(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 9143482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of the validity of animal techniques in eye-irritation testing.
    Swanston DW
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 4040059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of the eye irritation potential of shampoos using the in vitro SIRC cell toxicity test.
    North-Root H; Yackovich F; Demetrulias J; Gacula M; Heinze JE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):271-3. PubMed ID: 4040076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro quantitative determination of ophthalmic irritancy by the chorioallantoic membrane test with trypan blue staining as alternative to eye irritation test.
    Lagarto A; Vega R; Guerra I; González R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Aug; 20(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 16309878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alternatives to ocular irritation testing in animals.
    Atkinson KA; Fentem JH; Clothier RH; Balls M
    Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1992; 9(3-4):247-58. PubMed ID: 1301784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.