129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6624174)
1. [Static load on human cadaver femora with implanted hip endoprosthesis shafts in various forms].
Dienel RB; Manitz L; Jungnickel I; Holzweissig F
Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1983; 16(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 6624174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Friction of ceramic and metal hip hemi-endoprostheses against cadaveric acetabula.
Müller LP; Degreif J; Rudig L; Mehler D; Hely H; Rommens PM
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Dec; 124(10):681-7. PubMed ID: 15449077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of screw-in femoral implant in cementless total hip system.
Kim JY; Hayashi K; Garcia TC; Kim SY; Entwistle R; Kapatkin AS; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 22092256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical evaluation of adjunctive fixation for prevention of periprosthetic femur fracture with the Zurich cementless total hip prosthesis.
Pozzi A; Peck JN; Chao P; Choate CJ; Barousse D; Conrad B
Vet Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 23731463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Anatomically adapted endoprosthesis of the proximal end of the femur].
Henssge EJ; Grundei H; Etspüler R; Köller W; Fink K
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1985; 123(5):821-8. PubMed ID: 4082741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experimental results of stepped titanium shafts for hip endoprostheses].
Stock D; Gottstein J; Griss P; Winter M; Heimke G; Büsing CM
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1983; 121(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 6649813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro study of the strain distribution in human femora with anatomical and customised femoral stems.
Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Romundstad P; Aamodt A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):676-82. PubMed ID: 19407307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experience with bioceramic implants in orthopaedic surgery.
Knahr K; Salzer M; Plenk H; Grundschober F; Ramach W
Biomaterials; 1981 Apr; 2(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 7248428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs.
Callaghan JJ; Fulghum CS; Glisson RR; Stranne SK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Jul; 74(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 1634574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel locking screw hip stem to achieve immediate stability in total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical study.
Grechenig S; Gueorguiev B; Berner A; Heiss P; Müller M; Nerlich M; Schmitz P
Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S83-7. PubMed ID: 26542871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of hip stem material modulus on surface strain in human femora.
Vail TP; Glisson RR; Koukoubis TD; Guilak F
J Biomech; 1998 Jul; 31(7):619-28. PubMed ID: 9796684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Biomechanical analysis of the loosening of the femur prostheses (author's transl)].
Huggler AH; Jacob HA; Schreiber A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978); 1978 Oct; 92(4):261-72. PubMed ID: 727921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The centrometaphyseal femoral hip prosthesis: 8-year follow-up.
Vermeire D
Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():294-6. PubMed ID: 8116413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of the helica femoral implant system using traditional and modified techniques.
Dosch M; Hayashi K; Garcia TC; Weeren R; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 23980642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calcar unloading after hip replacement. A cadaver study of femoral stem designs.
Djerf K; Gillquist J
Acta Orthop Scand; 1987 Apr; 58(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 3604635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of calcar contact on femoral component micromovement. A mechanical study.
Markolf KL; Amstutz HC; Hirschowitz DL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1980 Dec; 62(8):1315-23. PubMed ID: 7440610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical compatibility of noncemented hip prostheses with the human femur.
Dujovne AR; Bobyn JD; Krygier JJ; Miller JE; Brooks CE
J Arthroplasty; 1993 Feb; 8(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 8436993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone remodeling and in vivo strain analysis of intact and implanted greyhound proximal femora.
Szivek JA; Johnson EM; Magee FP; Emmanual J; Poser R; Koeneman JB
J Invest Surg; 1994; 7(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 7918244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How does the relative wall thickness of human femora follow the biomechanical optima? An experimental study on mummies.
Evinger S; Suhai B; Bernáth B; Gerics B; Pap I; Horváth G
J Exp Biol; 2005 Mar; 208(Pt 5):899-905. PubMed ID: 15755888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
