These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6624422)

  • 21. Strain-controlled fatigue of acrylic bone cement.
    Carter DR; Gates EI; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Sep; 16(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 7130218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methyl methacrylate concentrations in tissues adjacent to bone cement.
    Petty W
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jul; 14(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 7400196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
    Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The viscosity of acrylic bone cements.
    Krause WR; Miller J; Ng P
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 May; 16(3):219-43. PubMed ID: 7085686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Holding power of metallic plates in cancellous bone. An experimental study on rabbits with polymethyl methacrylate as supporting material.
    Lapinsuo M; Pätiälä H; Sammaljärvi E; Honkaniemi L; Rokkanen P
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1993; 82(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8285575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Augmentation of acrylic bone cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes.
    Marrs B; Andrews R; Rantell T; Pienkowski D
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 May; 77(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 16392130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of storage duration on the hardness and tensile bond strength of silicone- and acrylic resin-based resilient denture liners to a processed denture base acrylic resin.
    Mese A; Guzel KG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 18262017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new bioactive bone cement: its histological and mechanical characterization.
    Nishimura N; Yamamuro T; Taguchi Y; Ikenaga M; Nakamura T; Kokubo T; Yoshihara S
    J Appl Biomater; 1991; 2(4):219-29. PubMed ID: 10149398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nanoparticulate fillers improve the mechanical strength of bone cement.
    Gomoll AH; Fitz W; Scott RD; Thornhill TS; Bellare A
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Jun; 79(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 18622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical properties of bone cement with addition of cefuroxime antibiotic.
    Mohd Fuad D; Masbah O; Shahril Y; Jamari S; Norhamdan MY; Sahrim SH
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Feb; 61 Suppl A():27-9. PubMed ID: 17042225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Mocarski R; Damron LA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Nov; 19(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 11781018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of bone mineral particles on the porosity of bone cement.
    Kim YS; Kang YH; Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 7920193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of vertebral cancellous bone augmented with compliant PMMA under dynamic loads.
    Boger A; Bohner M; Heini P; Schwieger K; Schneider E
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1688-93. PubMed ID: 18678533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reinforcement of bone cement using zirconia fibers with and without acrylic coating.
    Kotha S; Li C; Schmid S; Mason J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):898-906. PubMed ID: 18384160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mechanical characteristics of antibiotic-laden bone cement.
    Armstrong MS; Spencer RF; Cunningham JL; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):688-90. PubMed ID: 12553520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical assessment of a new adhesive bone cement for otologic surgery.
    Werning JW; Maniglia AJ; Anderson JM
    Am J Otol; 1995 May; 16(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 8588618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.