These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6624759)
1. U.S. Supreme Court decision in Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Association v. Abbott Laboratories et al. Podell LB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Sep; 40(9):1537-8. PubMed ID: 6624759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robinson-Patman update: De Modena v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan. Greenberg RB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Jul; 42(7):1572-4. PubMed ID: 4025357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Portland Retail Druggists Association vs Abbott Laboratories et al, part 1. Greenberg RB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1976 Jun; 33(6):572-3. PubMed ID: 1274976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Portland Retail Druggists Association vs Abbott Laboratories et al, part 2. Greenberg RB; Mandl FL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1976 Jul; 33(7):648-51. PubMed ID: 941919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential pricing of pharmaceuticals and retail competition under the Robinson-Patman Act. Abood RR Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(3):293-317. PubMed ID: 3842232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal implications of home health care by nonprofit hospitals. Greenberg RB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Feb; 43(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 3953602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Battered bottom lines: the impact of eroding pharmaceutical discounts on health-care institutions. Palumbo FB; Schondelmeyer SW; Miller DW; Speedie SM Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 May; 49(5):1177-85. PubMed ID: 1595750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court finds government hospitals not exempt from price discrimination charges. Peterson RN Health Law Vigil; 1983 Apr; 6(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 10259089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent supreme court antitrust rulings in health care. Podell LB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Apr; 40(4):639-41. PubMed ID: 6846375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antitrust and health care: provider controlled health plans and the Maricopa decision. Weller CD Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(3):223-49. PubMed ID: 6897759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How can PPOs control prices without violating antitrust laws? Fried JM Hosp Prog; 1984 Mar; 65(3):34-7. PubMed ID: 10265221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal implications of hospital resales of pharmaceuticals. American Hospital Association Office of General Counsel. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Aug; 43(8):1951-7. PubMed ID: 3752135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost containment in the health care field and the antitrust laws. Shapiro DI Am J Law Med; 1982; 7(4):425-35. PubMed ID: 7102679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract in Hyde antitrust decision. Reed TJ; Allen HS Hosp Med Staff; 1984 May; 13(5):2-9. PubMed ID: 10266239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy. Benshoof J Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How do states buy health insurance for their own employees? Maciejewski ML; Dowd BE; Feldman R Manag Care Q; 1997; 5(3):11-9. PubMed ID: 10169758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amendment of the fee exemption for federal, state and local government employees--DEA, Justice. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1994 Feb; 59(37):8859. PubMed ID: 10133414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]