These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 662564)
1. Effect of individual, small group, and large group method of presentation on modal performance in college men and women. Gould J Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Apr; 46(2):625-6. PubMed ID: 662564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter- vs intra-modal performance of college men and women. Gould J Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1219-25. PubMed ID: 604902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter- vs intramodal performance of college men and women: a replication. Gould J Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 2):1305-6. PubMed ID: 745919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs. Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lingual vibrotactile/auditory magnitude estimation and cross-modal matching: comparison of suprathreshold responses in men and women. Petrosino L; Fucci D; Harris D; Randolph-Tyler E Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):291-300. PubMed ID: 3211682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity. Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual and auditory conditional position discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Martinez L; Matsuzawa T Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 19615618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli in children and adults. Droit-Volet S; Tourret S; Wearden J Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):797-818. PubMed ID: 15204118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relation of auditory, visual, and auditory-visual matching to reading performance of Israeli children. Sharan S; Calfee R J Genet Psychol; 1977 Jun; 130(2d Half):181-9. PubMed ID: 881621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-modal attention: ERPs to auditory targets in an inter-modal oddball task. Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16529831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task. Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing. Ngo MK; Spence C Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of same-modality interference on immediate serial recall of auditory and visual information. Turner ML; Johnson SK; McNamara DS; Engle RW J Gen Psychol; 1992 Jul; 119(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 1447561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods for intramodal and cross-modal investigation of rhythms (temporal patterns) in audition, vision and touch. Mavlov L; Dascalov I Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1981; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 7315380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect. Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attention to stimulus presentation mode as a function of sex. Perelle IB J Psychol; 1979 Jul; 102(2d Half):225-33. PubMed ID: 480267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task. Brown CR; Barry RJ; Clarke AR Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]