166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6626786)
1. Audiometric zero for air conduction using manual audiometry.
Fearn RW; Hanson DR
Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 6626786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of high-frequency audiometry suitable for routine clinical use.
Rendell RJ; Miller JJ
Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6626785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-frequency audiometry. Normative studies and preliminary experiences.
Laukli E; Mair IW
Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 4059853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A practical method to differentiate the sensations of hearing and feeling (auditory and vibration threshold) in the low-frequency range (author's transl)].
Hülse M; Wisser R
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Dec; 60(12):624-7. PubMed ID: 7345299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brainstem electric response audiometry: estimation of the amount of conductive hearing loss with and without use of the response threshold.
van der Drift JF; van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
Audiology; 1989; 28(4):181-93. PubMed ID: 2751487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparative study of audiograms from two hospital (author's transl)].
Lin HH
Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1980 Jan; 79(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 6929885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Distribution Characteristics of Air-Bone Gaps: Evidence of Bias in Manual Audiometry.
Margolis RH; Wilson RH; Popelka GR; Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Saly GL
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 26627469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Nord-Trøndelag Norway Audiometric Survey 1996-98: unscreened thresholds and prevalence of hearing impairment for adults > 20 years.
Borchgrevink HM; Tambs K; Hoffman HJ
Noise Health; 2005; 7(28):1-15. PubMed ID: 16417702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
Baldwin M; Watkin P
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship of pulsed, continuous, and warble extended-high frequency thresholds.
Hamill TA; Haas WH
J Commun Disord; 1986 Jun; 19(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 3722436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of small changes in frequency on clinically determined estimates of auditory threshold.
Woodford CM
ASHA; 1984 Apr; 26(4):25-30. PubMed ID: 6732892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by pure-tone audiometry and by Békésy sweep audiometry.
Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():54-5. PubMed ID: 287352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to eliminate air-bone gaps audiometrically: use too much masking.
Miller MH
Ear Nose Throat J; 2008 May; 87(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 18572783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
