168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6626786)
21. The results of cortical electric response audiometry in medico-legal investigations.
Coles RR; Mason SM
Br J Audiol; 1984 May; 18(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 6733319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparative study of hearing screening procedures.
FitzZaland RE; Zink GD
Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 6468778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Audiometric thresholds among a Canadian sample of 10 to 17 year old students.
Marcoux AM; Feder K; Keith SE; Marro L; James ME; Michaud DS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2787-98. PubMed ID: 22501057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry].
Picard M; Ilecki HJ; Baxter JD
Audiology; 1988; 27(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 3056359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Advantages with a new Bekesy audiometer in the measurement of noise induced hearing loss.
Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):265-72. PubMed ID: 6939097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The challenge of detecting minimal hearing loss in audiometric surveys.
Schlauch RS; Carney E
Am J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 21(1):106-19. PubMed ID: 22271907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population.
Blanchet C; Pommie C; Mondain M; Berr C; Hillaire D; Puel JL
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 18520580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The relationship of continuous (C) and interrupted (I) tones at threshold and most comfortable loudness (MCL) in hearing-impaired ears.
Dancer J; Ventry IM
Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 6539262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity of automated threshold audiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mahomed F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH; Soer M
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 24165302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Audiometric study of workers engaged in the production of alumina].
Atzeri S; Avataneo G; Flore MV; Mallardi EV
Med Lav; 1981; 72(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 7335013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Air conduction thresholds and secretory otitis media: a conventional and extra-high frequency audiometric comparison.
Mair IW; Fjermedal O; Laukli E
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Oct; 98(10):767-71. PubMed ID: 2802458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Extended high-frequency thresholds in noise-induced hearing loss.
Hallmo P; Borchgrevink HM; Mair IW
Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7761799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Audiometric zero for air conduction. A verification and critique of international standards.
Robinson DW; Shipton MS; Hinchcliffe R
Audiology; 1981; 20(5):409-31. PubMed ID: 7271593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Differentiation of small changes in sound frequency in patients with conductive hearing loss].
Gryczyński M
Otolaryngol Pol; 1981; 35(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 7290708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise--induced hearing loss].
Wang Y; Yang B; Li Y; Hou L; Hu Y; Han Y
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 35(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 12768684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The reliability of Békésy sweep audiometry recording and effects of the earphone position.
Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1980; 366():99-112. PubMed ID: 6255732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Temporary shift of air conduction auditory threshold in extended ranges of high frequencies in persons exposed to noise].
Majzel K; Gierek T
Otolaryngol Pol; 1981; 35(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 7290707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Extended high-frequency audiometry: hearing thresholds in adults.
Škerková M; Kovalová M; Rychlý T; Tomášková H; Šlachtová H; Čada Z; Maďar R; Mrázková E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Feb; 280(2):565-572. PubMed ID: 35763083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
