122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6626938)
1. Imageability does not interact with visual field in lateral word recognition with oral report.
Lambert AJ; Beaumont JG
Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):115-42. PubMed ID: 6626938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual half-field word recognition as a function of syntactic class and imageability.
Day J
Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(5):515-9. PubMed ID: 514486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of word orientation and imageability on visual half-field presentations with a lexical decision task.
Howell JR; Bryden MP
Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(3):527-38. PubMed ID: 3683810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
Hines D
Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Right hemisphere language processing: lateral difference with imageable and nonimageable ambiguous words.
Deloche G; Seron X; Scius G; Segui J
Brain Lang; 1987 Mar; 30(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 3567547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tachistoscopic recognition of Kana and Hangul words, handedness and shift of laterality difference.
Shimizu A; Endo M
Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 7312151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional bias and visual field asymmetry.
Beaumont JG; Colley M
Cortex; 1980 Oct; 16(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 7214924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laterality differences in recognition of kana and kanji words.
Shimizu A; Endo M
Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1981 Dec; 3(6):705-20. PubMed ID: 7039245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of display and report order asymmetries on lateralized word recognition.
Boles DB
Brain Lang; 1985 Sep; 26(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 4052739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laterality and sex differences for visual recognition of emotional and non-emotional words.
Graves R; Landis T; Goodglass H
Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 7231670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Word imageability affects the hippocampus in recognition memory.
Klaver P; Fell J; Dietl T; Schür S; Schaller C; Elger CE; Fernández G
Hippocampus; 2005; 15(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 15986408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Word imageability effects on naming: a pilot investigation of beginning readers of Turkish.
Raman I
Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):472-4. PubMed ID: 10833741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does sex influence laterality differences in recognition of visually-presented kana or kanji words?
Shimizu A; Endo M; Egami M
Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1981; 35(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 7343442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comments on the interpretation of lateral asymmetries in the naming of words and line drawings.
Young AW; Ellis AW
Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 6626941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tachistoscopic recognition of normal and mirror images of Kana and Kanji characters.
Shimizu A; Endo M; Nakamura I
Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1983; 37(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6884915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are lateral differences in word processing modulated by concreteness, imageability, both, or neither?
Bruyer R; Racquez F
Int J Neurosci; 1985 Aug; 27(3-4):181-9. PubMed ID: 4044130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age of reading acquisition does not affect visual hemifield asymmetries for naming imageable nouns.
Young AW; Bion PJ; Ellis AW
Cortex; 1982 Oct; 18(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 7151456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are there different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual fields?
Schwartz S; Montagner S; Kirsner K
Brain Lang; 1987 Jul; 31(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 3620904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The mind's eye and the comparative judgement of number.
Besner D; Grimsell D; Davis R
Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(3-4):373-80. PubMed ID: 514475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When is between-hemisphere division of labor advantageous?
Liederman J; Meehan P
Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 3808294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
