These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6627480)
1. [New directions in the evaluation of the capacity for legal acts. I]. Utrata R Cesk Psychiatr; 1983 Aug; 79(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 6627480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's. Perlin ML Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. NAMH position statement on civil rights of mental patients. Ment Hyg; 1972; 56(2):67-9. PubMed ID: 5040911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Legal problems in hospitalization ordered by the district physician and by court's decision]. Hurlbeck W Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1974 Apr; 68(8):411-3. PubMed ID: 4409967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of forensic psychiatric opinions issued in Warsaw in 1968 during legal proceedings for deprivation of civil rights]. Fiutowski J Psychiatr Pol; 1977; 11(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 887677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An untraditional approach to a traditional problem. Silverberg HM MH; 1975; 59(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 1113685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Therapeutic issues associated with confidentiality and informed consent in forensic evaluations. Yates KF N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1994; 20(2):345-68. PubMed ID: 11659983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The new face of legal psychiatry. Robitscher J Am J Psychiatry; 1972 Sep; 129(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 4559783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Evaluation of Psychiatric Disability. Gold LH; Anfang SA; Drukteinis AM; Metzner JL; Price M; Wall BW; Wylonis L; Zonana HV J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4 Suppl):S3-S50. PubMed ID: 19092058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent legal-psychiatric developments in California. Pollack S Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 1230187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Law, property, and liberty: a polemic that fails. Stone AA Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1972 Jul; 42(4):627-31. PubMed ID: 5045457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Law, property, and psychiatry. Szasz TS; Alexander GJ Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1972 Jul; 42(4):610-26. PubMed ID: 5045456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The civil legal procedural competence of schizophrenia patients]. Gorinov VV; Koroleva EV Sud Med Ekspert; 1996; 39(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 8754516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do mental patients want legal counsel? A survey. Epstein L; Lowinger P Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1975 Jan; 45(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 1111303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The right to treatment. Holder AR JAMA; 1972 May; 220(8):1165-6. PubMed ID: 5067526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Legal rights and psychiatric care]. Lakartidningen; 1972 Dec; 69(52):6184-8. PubMed ID: 4675399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The legal restraints on psychiatric care. Feldman WS Leg Med; 1980; ():221-7. PubMed ID: 7421390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shrinking civil rights of alleged sexually violent predators. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2001; 25(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 11469146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The cutting edge: right to treatment. Rappaport JR MH; 1975; 59(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 1134396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]