These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6628640)

  • 1. The Family Planning Program and cuts in federal spending. 2. Initial effects on the provision of services.
    Torres A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(4):184-91. PubMed ID: 6628640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Family Planning Program and cuts in federal spending. 1. Impact on state management of family planning funds.
    Orr MT
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(4):176-84. PubMed ID: 6354742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.
    Gold RB; Sonfield A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 10435216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What the budget cuts mean for nurses.
    Angerer K
    Mich Nurse; 2005 Aug; 78(6):9. PubMed ID: 16128301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.
    Chamie M; Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):117-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 6788597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
    Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drive to tighten federal budget could revive cost control battle.
    Hague JE
    Hospitals; 1980 Jun; 54(11):19-20. PubMed ID: 7372286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic woes mean cuts to family planning services.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):104, 109-10. PubMed ID: 12284064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of strategic financial planning in the health care industry.
    Anderson D
    Top Health Care Financ; 1985; 11(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 4012787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Key policies emerging to govern delivery of family planning in Medicaid managed care.
    Gold RB
    Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Feb; 2(1):3-4, 7. PubMed ID: 12321967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bureaucracy and budget revision: how spending cuts are affecting India's public health programmes.
    Menghaney L
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1734. PubMed ID: 25857712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Worse cuts lie ahead.
    Oliver H
    Nurs N Z; 1997 Oct; 3(9):11. PubMed ID: 9386462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rural and urban family planning services in the United States.
    Torres A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 110616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings.
    Frost JJ; Finer LB; Tapales A
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 Aug; 19(3):778-96. PubMed ID: 18677070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oklahoma legislature faces budget crisis affecting health care.
    Ranking VW
    Okla Nurse; 2003; 48(3):13. PubMed ID: 14528730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who is the odd man out?: the experience of Western Europe in containing the costs of health care.
    Abel-Smith B
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3846805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2005 United States budget: wasteful expenditures, foregone opportunities.
    Stewart FH; Shields WC; Hwang AC
    Contraception; 2004 Aug; 70(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 15288210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The cost of health].
    Halter S
    Arch Belg Med Soc; 1981 Jul; 39(7):401-16. PubMed ID: 7348538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using global budgets in the United States.
    Traska MR
    Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10132791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
    Mcfarlane DR; Meier KJ
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1991; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.