128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 662928)
1. The yale cervical orthosis: an evaluation of its effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects and a comparison with other cervical orthoses.
Johnson RM; Hart DL; Owen JR; Lerner E; Chapin W; Zeleznik R
Phys Ther; 1978 Jul; 58(7):865-71. PubMed ID: 662928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical orthoses. A study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects.
Johnson RM; Hart DL; Simmons EF; Ramsby GR; Southwick WO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1977 Apr; 59(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 849944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Minerva cervicothoracic orthosis.
Sharpe KP; Rao S; Ziogas A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(13):1475-9. PubMed ID: 8623066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. A comparison study.
Askins V; Eismont FJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 9201855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
Ivancic PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of orthoses on three-dimensional load-displacement properties of the cervical spine.
Ivancic PC
Eur Spine J; 2013 Jan; 22(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 23090094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of Adjustable Cervical Orthoses and Modular Cervical Thoracic Orthoses in Restricting Neck Motion: A Comparative In vivo Biomechanical Study.
Gao F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(19):E1046-51. PubMed ID: 26076435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Nebraska collar, a new prototype cervical immobilization collar, with three standard models.
Alberts LR; Mahoney CR; Neff JR
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 Aug; 12(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 9715451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: roentgenographic and goniometric method of study.
Fisher SV; Bowar JF; Awad EA; Gullickson G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1977 Mar; 58(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 843201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cineradiography of the braced normal cervical spine. A comparative study of five commonly used cervical orthoses.
Hartman JT; Palumbo F; Hill BJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975; (109):97-102. PubMed ID: 1132211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of cervical orthoses on neck biomechanical responses during transitioning from supine to upright.
Ivancic PC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Mar; 28(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 23434342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study of low-temperature thermoplastic modified custom-molded cervical orthosis for cervical spine fixation.
Lau YC; Chang RK; Cheng YC; Chang GL; Chou YL; Leong CP; Wong MK
J Spinal Disord; 1994 Dec; 7(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 7873848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 3D motion analysis study comparing the effectiveness of cervical spine orthoses at restricting spinal motion through physiological ranges.
Evans NR; Hooper G; Edwards R; Whatling G; Sparkes V; Holt C; Ahuja S
Eur Spine J; 2013 Mar; 22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10-5. PubMed ID: 23288458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical collars are insufficient for immobilizing an unstable cervical spine injury.
Horodyski M; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 41(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 21397431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Yale cervical orthosis: fabrication.
Zeleznik R; Chapin W; Hart D; Smith H; Southwick WO; Zito M
Phys Ther; 1978 Jul; 58(7):861-4. PubMed ID: 662927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
