These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 662928)

  • 21. Thoracic segmental flexion during cervical forward bending.
    Fiebert IM; Spyropoulos T; Peterman D; Dotson L
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 3(4):80-5. PubMed ID: 24573143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses.
    Chin KR; Auerbach JD; Adams SB; Sodl JF; Riew KD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16481953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporating ligament laxity in a finite element model for the upper cervical spine.
    Lasswell TL; Cronin DS; Medley JB; Rasoulinejad P
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1755-1764. PubMed ID: 28673824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Manual fixation versus locking during upper cervical segmental mobilization. Part 2: an in vitro three-dimensional arthrokinematic analysis of manual axial rotation and lateral bending mobilization of the atlanto-axial joint.
    Cattrysse E; Baeyens JP; Clarys JP; Van Roy P
    Man Ther; 2007 Nov; 12(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 17189711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of the Cervical Orthosis on Swallowing Physiology and Cervical Spine Motion During Swallowing.
    Mekata K; Takigawa T; Matsubayashi J; Toda K; Hasegawa Y; Ito Y
    Dysphagia; 2016 Feb; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 26607160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervical orthoses: a guide to their selection and use.
    Johnson RM; Owen JR; Hart DL; Callahan RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981; (154):34-45. PubMed ID: 7471583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How effective is the Newport/Aspen collar? A prospective radiographic evaluation in healthy adult volunteers.
    Hughes SJ
    J Trauma; 1998 Aug; 45(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 9715199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduction in head and intervertebral motion provided by 7 contemporary cervical orthoses in 45 individuals.
    Schneider AM; Hipp JA; Nguyen L; Reitman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 17202874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization: Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System.
    Lang G; Hirschmüller A; Patermann S; Eichelberger P; Strohm P; Baur H; Südkamp NP; Herget GW
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e128-e146. PubMed ID: 29729467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Manual fixation versus locking during upper cervical segmental mobilization. Part 1: an in vitro three-dimensional arthrokinematic analysis of manual flexion-extension mobilization of the atlanto-occipital joint.
    Cattrysse E; Baeyens JP; Clarys JP; Van Roy P
    Man Ther; 2007 Nov; 12(4):342-52. PubMed ID: 17074528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Prerequisites for the manual therapy of diseases of the cervical spine].
    Khvisiuk NI; Kadyrova LA; Sak NN; Rechitskiĭ IZ; Sak AE
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1989 Sep; (9):1-4. PubMed ID: 2594338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vivo analysis of atlantoaxial motion in individuals immobilized with the halo thoracic vest or Philadelphia collar.
    Koller H; Zenner J; Hitzl W; Ferraris L; Resch H; Tauber M; Auffarth A; Lederer S; Mayer M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):670-9. PubMed ID: 19333098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical analysis of cervical orthoses in flexion and extension: a comparison of cervical collars and cervical thoracic orthoses.
    Gavin TM; Carandang G; Havey R; Flanagan P; Ghanayem A; Patwardhan AG
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(6):527-37. PubMed ID: 15077665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of in vivo lower cervical spinal loading using musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics model during the head flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation.
    Diao H; Xin H; Jin Z
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Nov; 232(11):1071-1082. PubMed ID: 30223718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Kinematics of the cervical spine of the adult horse.
    Clayton HM; Townsend HG
    Equine Vet J; 1989 May; 21(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 2731506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of the Sheffield Support Snood, an innovative cervical orthosis designed for people affected by neck muscle weakness.
    Pancani S; Rowson J; Tindale W; Heron N; Langley J; McCarthy AD; Quinn A; Reed H; Stanton A; Shaw PJ; McDermott CJ; Mazzà C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():201-6. PubMed ID: 26673978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spinal orthoses.
    Levine AM
    Am Fam Physician; 1984 Mar; 29(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 6230906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of 2 different thoracolumbar orthoses on the stability of the spine during various body movements.
    Kienle A; Saidi S; Oberst M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):E1082-9. PubMed ID: 23644685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical motion segment contributions to head motion during flexion\extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.
    Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
    Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2538-43. PubMed ID: 26334229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Review of cervical orthoses.
    Hart DL; Johnson RM; Simmons EF; Owen J
    Phys Ther; 1978 Jul; 58(7):857-60. PubMed ID: 662926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.