These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 663212)

  • 1. A comparison of mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Fewell TR; Shuping RE
    Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 663212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
    Boone JM
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography.
    Jennings RJ; Eastgate RJ; Siedband MP; Ergun DL
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 7290015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic x-ray spectra measured by Compton spectroscopy using a high resolution Schottky CdTe detector.
    Maeda K; Matsumoto M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(4):131-41. PubMed ID: 15795501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy, angular and spatial distributions of primary electrons inside photoconducting materials for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6439-60. PubMed ID: 17951854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct measurement of clinical mammographic x-ray spectra using a CdTe spectrometer.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; Furquim TA; Fausto AMF; Nogueira MS; Costa PR
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3504-3511. PubMed ID: 28429382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-rate x-ray spectroscopy in mammography with a CdTe detector: a digital pulse processing approach.
    Abbene L; Gerardi G; Principato F; Del Sordo S; Ienzi R; Raso G
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6147-56. PubMed ID: 21302771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monochromatic x-rays for low-dose digital mammography: preliminary results.
    Yoon KH; Kwon YM; Choi BJ; Son HH; Ryu CW; Chon KS; Park SH; Juhng SK
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Dec; 47(12):683-7. PubMed ID: 22996316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
    Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Niobium/molybdenum K-edge filtration in mammography: contrast and dose evaluation.
    Calicchia A; Gambaccini M; Indovina PL; Mazzei F; Pugliani L
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Sep; 41(9):1717-26. PubMed ID: 8884908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of X-ray spectra incident on and transmitted through breast tissue.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Doi K; Bernstein J
    Radiology; 1977 Aug; 124(2):511-3. PubMed ID: 877294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct analysis of molybdenum target generated x-ray spectra with a portable device.
    Stumbo S; Bottigli U; Golosio B; Oliva P; Tangaro S
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2763-70. PubMed ID: 15543781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
    Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Catalog of x-ray spectra of Mo-, Rh-, and W-anode-based x-ray tubes from 10 to 50 kV.
    Ketelhut S; Büermann L; Hilgers G
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33902019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laser-based microfocused x-ray source for mammography: feasibility study.
    Krol A; Ikhlef A; Kieffer JC; Bassano DA; Chamberlain CC; Jiang Z; Pépin H; Prasad SC
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):725-32. PubMed ID: 9167163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.