These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Dose reduction in xeroradiography of the breast. Van De Riet W; Wolfe JN AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 May; 128(5):821-3. PubMed ID: 404909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient exposures from film and xeroradiographic mammographic techniques. Rothenberg LN; Kirch RL; Snyder RE Radiology; 1975 Dec; 117(3 Pt 1):701-3. PubMed ID: 1188121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Xeroradiography of the breast with an improved technique. Willgeroth F; Weishaar J; Säbel M Strahlentherapie; 1976 Dec; 152(6):533-6. PubMed ID: 1006714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications. Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):913-8. PubMed ID: 6981974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Film and xeroradiographic images in mammography. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum anode materials. Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):968-72. PubMed ID: 1218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient radiation dose in conventional and xerographic cephalography. Copley RL; Glaze SA; Bushong SC; West DC Am J Orthod; 1979 Nov; 76(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 292313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applications of xeroradiography in dentistry-a review. Binnie WH; Cawson RA; Davis R; Stacey AJ Int Dent J; 1979 Mar; 29(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 283997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose comparisons for mammographic systems. Speiser RC; Zanrosso EM; Jeromin LS; Carlson RA Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 3784994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)]. Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients. Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques. Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 200 kV xeroradiography in occupational exposure to silica and asbestos. Thomas RG; Sluis-Cremer GK Br J Ind Med; 1977 Nov; 34(4):281-90. PubMed ID: 588484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitometric characteristics of dental xeroradiography. Gratt BM; Sickles EA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Nov; 56(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 6580602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation exposure to the patient in xeroradiography. Boag JW; Stacey AJ; Davis R Br J Radiol; 1976 Mar; 49(579):253-61. PubMed ID: 1276592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of kVp and mAs for pediatric low-dose simulated abdominal CT: is it best to base parameter selection on object circumference? Reid J; Gamberoni J; Dong F; Davros W AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Oct; 195(4):1015-20. PubMed ID: 20858833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative development xeroradiography of the breast: doses and clinical indications. Keddy RJ; Brebner DM Br J Radiol; 1980 Apr; 53(628):325-30. PubMed ID: 7378700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]