These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6632460)

  • 1. Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica 09 infection in camels serodiagnosed as brucellosis.
    Sunaga Y; Tani F; Mukai K
    Nihon Juigaku Zasshi; 1983 Apr; 45(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 6632460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Incidence of antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica in swine sera in relation to the serological differentiation of Brucella infections].
    Schmittdiel E; von Wangenheim B; Chorherr S
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 98(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3985937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The porcine brucellosis--evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in occurrence of false positive serological reactions.
    Weiner M; Szulowski K; Iwaniak W
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2013; 16(1):129-30. PubMed ID: 23691587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human and animal epidemic of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9, 1989-1997, Auvergne, France.
    Gourdon F; Beytout J; Reynaud A; Romaszko JP; Perre D; Theodore P; Soubelet H; Sirot J
    Emerg Infect Dis; 1999; 5(5):719-21. PubMed ID: 10511531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Possibility of the serological differential diagnosis of human brucellosis and yersiniasis].
    Zheludkov MM; Dunaev VI
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1983 Jan; (1):42-5. PubMed ID: 6404076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9.
    Erdenebaatar J; Bayarsaikhan B; Watarai M; Makino S; Shirahata T
    Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2003 Jul; 10(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 12853409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a western blotting assay to discriminate Brucella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 infections in sheep.
    Corrente M; Desario C; Greco G; Buonavoglia D; Pratelli A; Madio A; Scaltrito D; Consenti B; Buonavoglia C
    New Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15164626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in a field trial.
    Gerbier G; Garin-Bastuji B; Pouillot R; Véry P; Cau C; Berr V; Dufour B; Moutou F
    Vet Res; 1997; 28(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 9257445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serologic response of pigs to experimental infection with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O9 and Brucella abortus.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Mar; 42(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 6791534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Garin-Bastuji B; Hummel N; Gerbier G; Cau C; Pouillot R; Da Costa M; Fontaine JJ
    Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
    Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
    Riber U; Jungersen G
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.
    Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Ross GP; Joyce MA; Fenwick S; Heesemann J; Wolf-Watz H; Nielsen K
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 8748542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Yersinia enterocolitica: an unlikely cause of positive brucellosis tests in greater yellowstone ecosystem bison (Bison bison).
    See W; Edwards WH; Dauwalter S; Almendra C; Kardos MD; Lowell JL; Wallen R; Cain SL; Holben WE; Luikart G
    J Wildl Dis; 2012 Jul; 48(3):537-41. PubMed ID: 22740518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9. III. Specificity of the in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon test for bovine brucellosis diagnosis in experimentally Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9-infected cattle.
    Kittelberger R; Reichel MP; Joyce MA; Staak C
    Vet Microbiol; 1997 Oct; 57(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 9444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.
    Jungersen G; Sørensen V; Giese SB; Stack JA; Riber U
    Epidemiol Infect; 2006 Apr; 134(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 16490140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of an in vitro allergy test for the differential diagnosis of human brucellosis and yersiniosis].
    Zheludkov MM; Chernysheva MI
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1985 Feb; (2):92-5. PubMed ID: 3922184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 09 infections: use of lymphocyte transformation test.
    Chukwu CC
    Int J Zoonoses; 1985 Jun; 12(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 3935592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Laboratory diagnosis of Yersinia infection and its improvement].
    Iushchuk ND; Shestakova IV
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 2007; (3):61-6. PubMed ID: 17672133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of the capability of existing and novel serodiagnostic methods for porcine brucellosis to reduce false positive serological reactions.
    McGiven JA; Nicola A; Commander NJ; Duncombe L; Taylor AV; Villari S; Dainty A; Thirlwall R; Bouzelmat N; Perrett LL; Brew SD; Stack JA
    Vet Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 160(3-4):378-86. PubMed ID: 22763172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.