These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Orthography and phonology in lexical decision: evidence from repetition effects at different lags. Bentin S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jan; 15(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 2522142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Perea M; Carreiras M Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suedohomofoan effects in visual word recognition: evidence for phonological processing. Besner D; Davelaar E Can J Psychol; 1983 Jun; 37(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 6616344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The strong, the weak, and the first: The impact of phonological stress on processing of orthographic errors in silent reading. Kriukova O; Mani N Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 1636():208-218. PubMed ID: 26790350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition. Frost R; Katz L Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 2725267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From SOFA to LOUCH: lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation. Rosson MB Mem Cognit; 1983 Mar; 11(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 6865749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual differences in orthographic priming relate to phonological decoding skill in adults. Welcome SE; Trammel ER Cogn Process; 2017 May; 18(2):119-128. PubMed ID: 28188455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Lupker SJ Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 7172126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Seidenberg MS Cognition; 1985 Feb; 19(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 4039640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Simpson GB Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria. Waters GS; Seidenberg MS Mem Cognit; 1985 Nov; 13(6):557-72. PubMed ID: 3831712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: on the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations. Maloney E; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Besner D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):858-67. PubMed ID: 19107643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition. Amenta S; Marelli M; Sulpizio S Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):887-893. PubMed ID: 27572870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use and nature of grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access. Commissaire E; Casalis S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1324-1339. PubMed ID: 28398115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orthographic and lexical processing of visual letter strings. Marmurek HH; Briscoe G Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 7172127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Humphreys GW; Evett LJ; Taylor DE Mem Cognit; 1982 Nov; 10(6):576-90. PubMed ID: 7162419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]