These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Protecting human subjects of research: an analysis of proposed amendments to HEW policy. de Sola Pool I PS (Wash DC); 1979; 12(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 11649394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical battery and failure to obtain informed consent: Illinois court decision suggests potential for IRB liability. LeBlang TR IRB; 1995; 17(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 11654268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Non-therapeutic medical research involving human subjects. Bloom MJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1973; 24():1067-1099. PubMed ID: 11664224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The expert surrogate system: a role for the Golden Rule in clinical practice. Mackillop WJ Humane Med; 1988 Nov; 4(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 11650833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Using the brain dead for medical research. Martyn SR Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The IRB as deputy sheriff: proposed FDA regulation of the institutional review board. Huff TA Clin Res; 1979 Apr; 27(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10241072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Americans want to water down Helsinki Declaration. Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Mar; No. 136():3-4. PubMed ID: 11657531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Informed consent in research and the critically ill adult. Woods SL Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1988; 3(3):89-92. PubMed ID: 3420102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns. Kobasic DM J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Why HHS should reconsider its proposed exemption for social policy experiments. Abram MB; IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Necessity of an ethics committee in a research center]. Leduc G Union Med Can; 1982 Mar; 111(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 7080273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Walking a thin line: distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm. Schuchardt EJ Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992; 26(1):77-115. PubMed ID: 11651647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The search for a cure: combating the problem of conflicts of interest that currently plagues biomedical research. Clamon JB Iowa Law Rev; 2003 Oct; 89(1):235-71. PubMed ID: 15732180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]