These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6635664)
1. Law and science policy in federal regulation of formaldehyde. Ashford NA; Ryan CW; Caldart CC Science; 1983 Nov; 222(4626):894-900. PubMed ID: 6635664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Formaldehyde. Council on Scientific Affairs. JAMA; 1989 Feb; 261(8):1183-7. PubMed ID: 2644463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urea formaldehyde foam insulation: defusing a timebomb. Fox EM Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 3832945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Formaldehyde. AMA Council on Scientific Affairs. Conn Med; 1989 Apr; 53(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 2663337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Six years after the NRC review of EPA's Draft IRIS Toxicological Review of Formaldehyde: Regulatory implications of new science in evaluating formaldehyde leukemogenicity. Mundt KA; Gentry PR; Dell LD; Rodricks JV; Boffetta P Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Feb; 92():472-490. PubMed ID: 29158043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chromium and regulation: bits and pieces. Beall JR Sci Total Environ; 1989 Oct; 86(1-2):187-90. PubMed ID: 2602934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of political interference / EPA air pollution decision threatens public health: science disregarded, misrepresented on particulate matter standard. Union of Concerned Scientists New Solut; 2007; 17(1-2):7-11. PubMed ID: 17434854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk assessment in the policy-making process: environmental health and safety protection. Regens JL; Dietz TM; Rycroft RW Public Adm Rev; 1983; 43(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 10259246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production. Karny GM Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law-medicine notes. An end to federal regulation: the good, the bad, and the unnecessary. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1982 Mar; 306(11):653-4. PubMed ID: 6799825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of carcinogenicity classifications and evaluations: the case of formaldehyde. Binetti R; Costamagna FM; Marcello I Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2006; 42(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 17033133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. State, federal agencies take action on waste. OR Manager; 1989 Apr; 5(4):7. PubMed ID: 10292677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Who's in charge of children's environmental health at school? Paulson J; Barnett C New Solut; 2010; 20(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 20359989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Daubert and the proper role for the courts in health, safety, and environmental regulation. McGarity TO Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S92-8. PubMed ID: 16030345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]