These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6636223)

  • 1. Family planning services from multiple provider types: an assessment for the United States.
    Hendershot GE
    Stud Fam Plann; 1983; 14(8-9):218-27. PubMed ID: 6636223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A formula for the 1970s: estimating need for subsidized family planning services in the United States.
    Guttmacher AF
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(3):145-74. PubMed ID: 4805736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning status of marital births, 1975-1976.
    Anderson JE
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(2):62-3, 67-70. PubMed ID: 7250341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commentary: some policy and program implications of "contraceptive failure in the United States".
    Jaffe FS
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 4805735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Family planning in the 1970s--a dynamic force affecting the status of children.
    Gray NT
    Child Welfare; 1971 Mar; 50(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 5164338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Family planning--a matter of health.
    Gibbs CE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Apr; 41(4):621-3. PubMed ID: 4735316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fertility and family planning in the 1970s: the National Survey of Family Growth.
    Mosher WD
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(6):314-20. PubMed ID: 7151988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social pressure on family size intentions.
    Griffth J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 4805743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women who need and receive family planning services: estimates at mid-decade.
    Dryfoos JG
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(4):172-9. PubMed ID: 1157904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in fertility, family size preferences, and practice of family planning: Taiwan, 1965-1973.
    Freedman R; Coombs LC; Chang MC; Sun TH
    Stud Fam Plann; 1974 Sep; 5(9):270-88. PubMed ID: 4416736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lack of family planning leading to induced abortion in rural Greece.
    Lovel H; Bakoula C
    IPPF Med Bull; 1985 Jun; 19(3):1. PubMed ID: 12280151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey report: Ecuador.
    Kent MM
    Popul Today; 1987 Dec; 15(12):5. PubMed ID: 12341909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unwanted and mistimed births in the United States: 1968--1973.
    Weller RH; Hobbs FB
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1978; 10(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 658325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994.
    Frost JJ
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(3):92-100. PubMed ID: 8827144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contraceptive development and better family planning.
    Segal SJ
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1996; 73(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 8804742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observations on evaluation of family planning programs.
    Goldstein H
    Health Serv Rep; 1973 Mar; 88(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 4690205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fertility and family planning in Haiti.
    Allman J
    Stud Fam Plann; 1982; 13(8-9):237-45. PubMed ID: 7135453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visits to family planning clinics: United States, 1979.
    Bloom B
    Adv Data; 1981 Sep; (74):1-7. PubMed ID: 10254006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of family planning clinic programs on adolescent pregnancy.
    Forrest JD; Hermalin AI; Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 7250347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception.
    Jones RK; Boonstra H
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(5):182-91. PubMed ID: 15519960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.