296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6638018)
1. The fetus as a patient: emerging rights as a person?
Lenow JL
Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 6638018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn.
King PA
Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
Barber RA
Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion on demand.
Rovinsky JJ
Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 6608671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework.
Mangel CP
Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
Buckley M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Unborn children as constitutional persons.
Roden GJ
Issues Law Med; 2010; 25(3):185-273. PubMed ID: 20443281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as patient.
Murray TH
Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):329-43. PubMed ID: 3595055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers.
Dougherty CJ
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
Rush SE
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment.
Westfall D
Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal politics: the debate on experimenting with the unborn.
Gaylin W; Lappé M
Atl Mon; 1975 May; 235(5):66-71. PubMed ID: 11663535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
Chemerinsky E
Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
Jubb ED
Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion: is there a rational precept?
Reiter RC; Johnson SR; Beller FK
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):464-7. PubMed ID: 1876385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
