These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6638020)
21. Forced cesareans: the most unkindest cut of all. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):16-7, 45. PubMed ID: 7107234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. She's going to die: the case of Angela C. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 3350646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making. Stanyer BT Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Court ordered obstetric intervention: a commentary. Brenner B; Burnet P N Z Med J; 1995 Oct; 108(1010):431-2. PubMed ID: 7478347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In re Baby Boy Doe. Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Second Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1994 Apr; 632():326-35. PubMed ID: 12041260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. When parental autonomy clashes with a child's interest in the advances of science: the case for the future of court-ordered gene therapy. Applebaum AR Wayne Law Rev; 2003; 48(4):1543-59. PubMed ID: 15568245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Reply to Sarah Burns. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Crain CA Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Terminal care and the pregnant woman: ethical reflections on In Re: A.C. Tuohey JF Pediatrics; 1991 Dec; 88(6):1268-73. PubMed ID: 1956747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion. Marsh FH Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The fetal right to live. Leiberman JR; Mazor M; Chaim W; Cohen A Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):515-7. PubMed ID: 440657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bioethics for clinicians: 12. Ethical dilemmas that arise in the care of pregnant women: rethinking "maternal-fetal conflicts". Flagler E; Baylis F; Rodgers S CMAJ; 1997 Jun; 156(12):1729-32. PubMed ID: 9220925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins. Crepps J; Miller A Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Maternal-fetal conflict: a study of physician concerns in court-ordered cesarean sections. Elkins TE; Brown D; Barclay M; Andersen HF J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 2131088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers. Dougherty CJ Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled. Loewy AH North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]