These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6639012)

  • 1. Relation of rumen ATP concentration to bacterial and protozoal numbers.
    Nuzback DE; Bartley EE; Dennis SM; Nagaraja TG; Galitzer SJ; Dayton AD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 46(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 6639012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative correlation between protozoal and bacterial levels in rumen samples and its relation to the determination of dietary effects on the rumen microbial population.
    Teather RM; Mahadevan S; Erfle JD; Sauer FD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Mar; 47(3):566-70. PubMed ID: 6712223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of ruminal bacterial populations and protozoal generation time in cows fed different methionine sources.
    Karnati SK; Sylvester JT; Noftsger SM; Yu Z; St-Pierre NR; Firkins JL
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Feb; 90(2):798-809. PubMed ID: 17235157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in the rumen microbial population and its activities during the refaunation period after the reintroduction of ciliate protozoa into the rumen of defaunated sheep.
    Williams AG; Withers SE
    Can J Microbiol; 1993 Jan; 39(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 8439876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial protein degradation by different rumen protozoal groups.
    Belanche A; de la Fuente G; Moorby JM; Newbold CJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4495-504. PubMed ID: 22829613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isolation and characteristics of the protozoal and bacterial fractions from bovine ruminal contents.
    Martin C; Williams AG; Michalet-Doreau B
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Nov; 72(11):2962-8. PubMed ID: 7730192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The use of ribonucleic acids as markers for the measuring of microbial protein yield in the rumen. 2. The effect of sample treatment, the time of sampling and the composition of the ration on the RNA:N ratio in rumen microbes].
    Schönhusen U; Voigt J; Piatkowski B; Kreienbring F
    Arch Tierernahr; 1990; 40(1-2):75-84. PubMed ID: 1693067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of intoxication with organophosphates on rumen bacteria and rumen protozoa and protective effect of clinoptilolite-rich zeolite on bacterial and protozoan concentration in rumen.
    Nistiar F; Mojzis J; Kovác G; Seidel H; Rácz O
    Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2000; 45(6):567-71. PubMed ID: 11501425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on the digestion of the cell wall fraction of a mixed diet in defaunated and refaunated sheep rumen.
    Jouany JP; Mathieu F; Senaud J; Bohatier J; Bertin G; Mercier M
    Reprod Nutr Dev; 1998; 38(4):401-16. PubMed ID: 9795984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occurrence of 2-aminoethylphosphonic acid in feeds, ruminal bacteria and duodenal digesta from defaunated sheep.
    Ankrah P; Loerch SC; Dehority BA
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Apr; 67(4):1061-9. PubMed ID: 2715111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digestion of a dehydrated lucerne/barley diet (70:30) in defaunated, Isotricha-monoinoculated and mixed-fauna-inoculated rumen in sheep.
    Sénaud J; Jouany JP; Lassalas B; Bohatier J
    Reprod Nutr Dev; 1995; 35(3):249-66. PubMed ID: 7612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the rate of breakdown of bacterial protein in rumen fluid.
    Wallace RJ; McPherson CA
    Br J Nutr; 1987 Sep; 58(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 3118940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamics of protozoa in the rumen of cattle.
    Ffoulkes D; Leng RA
    Br J Nutr; 1988 May; 59(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 2840114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of adenosine 5'-triphosphate as an indicator of the microbiota biomass in rumen contents.
    Forsberg CW; Lam K
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Mar; 33(3):528-37. PubMed ID: 16345203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lysis of viable rumen bacteria in bovine rumen fluid.
    Jarvis BD
    Appl Microbiol; 1968 May; 16(5):714-23. PubMed ID: 5659364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of sampling site on concentrations and carbohydrate-degrading enzyme activities of protozoa and bacteria in the rumen.
    Martin C; Devillard E; Michalet-Doreau B
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Apr; 77(4):979-87. PubMed ID: 10328366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation of the dynamics of protozoa in the rumen.
    Dijkstra J
    Br J Nutr; 1994 Nov; 72(5):679-99. PubMed ID: 7826992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation of the effects of diet on the contribution of rumen protozoa to degradation of fibre in the rumen.
    Dijkstra J; Tamminga S
    Br J Nutr; 1995 Nov; 74(5):617-34. PubMed ID: 8541269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Size fractionation of a rumen microbial population by counter-flow centrifugal elutriation.
    Munyard KA; Baker SK
    J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):566-73. PubMed ID: 16820232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of methanogenic bacteria with rumen protozoa.
    Krumholz LR; Forsberg CW; Veira DM
    Can J Microbiol; 1983 Jun; 29(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 6411316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.