BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6639901)

  • 1. A retrospective review of cervical cytology in women developing invasive squamous cell carcinoma.
    Walker EM; Hare MJ; Cooper P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Nov; 90(11):1087-91. PubMed ID: 6639901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
    Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
    Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
    Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings.
    Costa MJ; Kenny MB; Naib ZM
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 1994621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cytological history of 148 women presenting with invasive cervical cancer].
    Mubiayi N; Bogaert E; Boman F; Leblanc E; Vinatier D; Leroy JL; Querleu D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2002 Mar; 30(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 11998209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s.
    Mitchell H; Medley G; Giles G
    BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6740):1622-6. PubMed ID: 2372641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical smear histories of 585 women with biopsy-proven carcinoma in situ.
    Bergeron C; Debaque H; Ayivi J; Amaizo S; Fagnani F
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1676-80. PubMed ID: 9390123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
    Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HPV presence precedes abnormal cytology in women developing cervical cancer and signals false negative smears.
    Zielinski GD; Snijders PJ; Rozendaal L; Voorhorst FJ; van der Linden HC; Runsink AP; de Schipper FA; Meijer CJ
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Aug; 85(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 11487272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
    Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cytological diagnosis of precancerous conditions and carcinoma of the uterine cervix].
    Kubancok J; Vatralová L; Jankyová T; Tekeliaková J; Vartovníková G; Spodniaková A; Lisý A
    Cesk Patol; 1990 Aug; 26(3):152-61. PubMed ID: 2208327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
    Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors of cervical cancer after a negative cytological diagnosis in Polish cervical cancer screening programme.
    Macios A; Didkowska J; Wojciechowska U; Komerska K; Glińska P; Kamiński MF; Nowakowski A
    Cancer Med; 2021 May; 10(10):3449-3460. PubMed ID: 33934537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cytological changes preceding cervical cancer.
    Robertson JH; Woodend B; Elliott H
    J Clin Pathol; 1994 Mar; 47(3):278-9. PubMed ID: 8093150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
    Sherman ME; Kelly D
    Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear?
    Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency of cytological screening for detection of cervical squamous carcinoma. A study in the county of Uppsala 1991-1994.
    Jansson A; Gustafsson M; Wilander E
    Ups J Med Sci; 1998; 103(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 9923069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cytological screening history of 469 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri; does interval carcinoma exist?
    Kenter GG; Schoonderwald EM; Koelma IA; Arentz N; Hermans J; Fleuren GJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Apr; 75(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 8638464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.