201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6641508)
1. The role of the institutional review board in research involving human subjects.
Bosso JA
Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1983 Nov; 17(11):828-34. PubMed ID: 6641508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards.
Waggoner WC
Clin Dermatol; 1991; 9(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 1822404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Made in the U.S.A.: legal and ethical issues in artificial heart experimentation.
Annas GJ
Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):164-71. PubMed ID: 3645227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Protecting and informing human research subjects.
Check WA
JAMA; 1980 May 23-30; 243(20):1985-6, 1988, 1993. PubMed ID: 7373734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of human subjects; informed consent; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations; and clinical investigations which may be reviewed through expedited review procedures.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Fed Regist; 1981 Jan; 46(17):8942-80. PubMed ID: 11658611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group.
Moreno J; Caplan AL; Wolpe PR
JAMA; 1998 Dec; 280(22):1951-8. PubMed ID: 9851484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Waivers proposed for emergency studies.
Wolfgang L
Science; 1995 Oct; 270(5233):25-6. PubMed ID: 7569946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical research in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type: suggested guidelines addressing the ethical and legal issues.
Melnick VL; Dubler NN; Weisbard A; Butler RN
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Jul; 32(7):531-6. PubMed ID: 6736520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent for biomedical research in acute care medicine.
Spivey WH; Abramson NS; Iserson KV; MacKay CR; Cohen MP
Ann Emerg Med; 1991 Nov; 20(11):1251-65. PubMed ID: 1952317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.
Ackerman TF
IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Keeping research subjects out of harm's way.
Ellis GB
JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(20):1963-5. PubMed ID: 10580465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutional Review Board review and consent for research: what's behind the statistics?
Danis M; Grady C
Crit Care Med; 1998 Sep; 26(9):1488-9. PubMed ID: 9751583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research ethics. NIH examines standards for consent.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1688. PubMed ID: 9660706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The IRB as deputy sheriff: proposed FDA regulation of the institutional review board.
Huff TA
Clin Res; 1979 Apr; 27(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10241072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutional review boards and medical devices.
Less JR; Alpert S; Nightingale SL
JAMA; 1994 Sep; 272(12):968-9. PubMed ID: 8084066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Review boards: a system 'in jeopardy'?
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5371):1830-1. PubMed ID: 9669930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
