These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6641508)
1. The role of the institutional review board in research involving human subjects. Bosso JA Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1983 Nov; 17(11):828-34. PubMed ID: 6641508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Made in the U.S.A.: legal and ethical issues in artificial heart experimentation. Annas GJ Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):164-71. PubMed ID: 3645227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Protecting and informing human research subjects. Check WA JAMA; 1980 May 23-30; 243(20):1985-6, 1988, 1993. PubMed ID: 7373734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group. Moreno J; Caplan AL; Wolpe PR JAMA; 1998 Dec; 280(22):1951-8. PubMed ID: 9851484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Waivers proposed for emergency studies. Wolfgang L Science; 1995 Oct; 270(5233):25-6. PubMed ID: 7569946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical research in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type: suggested guidelines addressing the ethical and legal issues. Melnick VL; Dubler NN; Weisbard A; Butler RN J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Jul; 32(7):531-6. PubMed ID: 6736520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent for biomedical research in acute care medicine. Spivey WH; Abramson NS; Iserson KV; MacKay CR; Cohen MP Ann Emerg Med; 1991 Nov; 20(11):1251-65. PubMed ID: 1952317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects. Owens JF Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research. Ackerman TF IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Keeping research subjects out of harm's way. Ellis GB JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(20):1963-5. PubMed ID: 10580465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional Review Board review and consent for research: what's behind the statistics? Danis M; Grady C Crit Care Med; 1998 Sep; 26(9):1488-9. PubMed ID: 9751583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research ethics. NIH examines standards for consent. Marshall E Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1688. PubMed ID: 9660706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The IRB as deputy sheriff: proposed FDA regulation of the institutional review board. Huff TA Clin Res; 1979 Apr; 27(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10241072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional review boards and medical devices. Less JR; Alpert S; Nightingale SL JAMA; 1994 Sep; 272(12):968-9. PubMed ID: 8084066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Review boards: a system 'in jeopardy'? Marshall E Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5371):1830-1. PubMed ID: 9669930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Continuing review of research involving human subjects: approach to the problem and remaining areas of concern. Gordon B; Prentice E IRB; 1997; 19(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11655323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]