226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6642197)
1. Codon substitution in evolution and the "saturation" of synonymous changes.
Gojobori T
Genetics; 1983 Dec; 105(4):1011-27. PubMed ID: 6642197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inferring natural selection operating on conservative and radical substitution at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y
Genes Genet Syst; 2007 Aug; 82(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 17895585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Selection at the Amino Acid Level on the Usage of Synonymous Codons.
Błażej P; Mackiewicz D; Wnętrzak M; Mackiewicz P
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Mar; 7(3):967-981. PubMed ID: 28122952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nucleic acid composition, codon usage, and the rate of synonymous substitution in protein-coding genes.
Ticher A; Graur D
J Mol Evol; 1989 Apr; 28(4):286-98. PubMed ID: 2499685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes.
Li WH; Wu CI; Luo CC
Mol Biol Evol; 1985 Mar; 2(2):150-74. PubMed ID: 3916709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonsynonymous, synonymous and nonsense mutations in human cancer-related genes undergo stronger purifying selections than expectation.
Chu D; Wei L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):359. PubMed ID: 30991970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of average number of nucleotide substitutions when the rate of substitution varies with nucleotide.
Gojobori T; Ishii K; Nei M
J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):414-23. PubMed ID: 7175958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Large-scale analyses of synonymous substitution rates can be sensitive to assumptions about the process of mutation.
Aris-Brosou S; Bielawski JP
Gene; 2006 Aug; 378():58-64. PubMed ID: 16797879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved inference of site-specific positive selection under a generalized parametric codon model when there are multinucleotide mutations and multiple nonsynonymous rates.
Dunn KA; Kenney T; Gu H; Bielawski JP
BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30642241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Weak selection on synonymous codons substantially inflates
Rahman S; Kosakovsky Pond SL; Webb A; Hey J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(20):. PubMed ID: 33972434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SENCA: A Multilayered Codon Model to Study the Origins and Dynamics of Codon Usage.
Pouyet F; Bailly-Bechet M; Mouchiroud D; Guéguen L
Genome Biol Evol; 2016 Aug; 8(8):2427-41. PubMed ID: 27401173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions.
Ina Y
J Mol Evol; 1995 Feb; 40(2):190-226. PubMed ID: 7699723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in Drosophila: mutation, selection or relaxed constraints?
Comeron JM; Kreitman M
Genetics; 1998 Oct; 150(2):767-75. PubMed ID: 9755207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome.
Muse SV; Gaut BS
Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Sep; 11(5):715-24. PubMed ID: 7968485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions.
Tzeng YH; Pan R; Li WH
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Dec; 21(12):2290-8. PubMed ID: 15329386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural selection pressure exerted on "Silent" mutations during the evolution of SARS-CoV-2: Evidence from codon usage and RNA structure.
Bai H; Ata G; Sun Q; Rahman SU; Tao S
Virus Res; 2023 Jan; 323():198966. PubMed ID: 36244617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extensive purifying selection acting on synonymous sites in HIV-1 Group M sequences.
Ngandu NK; Scheffler K; Moore P; Woodman Z; Martin D; Seoighe C
Virol J; 2008 Dec; 5():160. PubMed ID: 19105834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y; Gojobori T
Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):1315-28. PubMed ID: 10563013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Crossing fitness valleys via double substitutions within codons.
Belinky F; Sela I; Rogozin IB; Koonin EV
BMC Biol; 2019 Dec; 17(1):105. PubMed ID: 31842858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
