BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6643303)

  • 1. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of Duroc and Yorkshire boars and gilts and reciprocal breed crosses.
    Bereskin B; Steele NC
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Apr; 62(4):918-26. PubMed ID: 3710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breed prenatal, breed postnatal and heterosis effects for postweaning traits in swine.
    Toelle VD; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Aug; 57(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 6619010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal effects on traits measured during postweaning performance test of swine from four breeds.
    Johnson ZB; Chewning JJ; Nugent RA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1470-7. PubMed ID: 12078726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of performance of progeny from test station boars.
    van Alst G; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2078-85. PubMed ID: 1644681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig growth and carcass traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2286-302. PubMed ID: 12350006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
    Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Growth performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and purebred and crossbred boars.
    McLaren DG; Buchanan DS; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1987 Jan; 64(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 3818493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An embryo transfer study of reciprocal cross differences in growth and carcass traits of Duroc and Landrace pigs.
    Wilken TM; Lo LL; McLaren DG; Fernando RL; Dziuk PJ
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2349-58. PubMed ID: 1506298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three-breed and backcross swine for litter productivity and postweaning performance.
    Wilson ER; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 7240036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heritability of body length and measures of body density and their relationship to backfat thickness and loin muscle area in swine.
    Johnson ZB; Nugent RA
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1943-9. PubMed ID: 12926776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds.
    Ask B; Pedersen LV; Christensen OF; Nielsen HM; Turner SP; Nielsen B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):15. PubMed ID: 33579188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1895-902. PubMed ID: 15309934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic evaluation for a three-way crossbreeding system considering breed-of-origin of alleles.
    Sevillano CA; Vandenplas J; Bastiaansen JWM; Bergsma R; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Oct; 49(1):75. PubMed ID: 29061123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic analyses of growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits in Duroc and Landrace pigs: I. Breed effects.
    Lo LL; McLaren DG; McKeith FK; Fernando RL; Novakofski J
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2373-86. PubMed ID: 1506301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection line x diet interactions for two lines of pigs fed 12 or 24% protein diets.
    Bereskin B; Steele NC; Mitchell AD
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Apr; 68(4):944-59. PubMed ID: 2332394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic and maternal effects on pig weights, growth and probe backfat in diallel crosses of high- and low-fat lines of swine.
    Bereskin B; Hetzer HO
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Aug; 63(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 3759676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for growth and composition.
    Edwards DB; Tempelman RJ; Bates RO
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Feb; 84(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 16424252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.