These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6643843)

  • 1. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1204-13. PubMed ID: 6643843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. IV. Additivity of forward-masking and rate-induced wave V latency shifts.
    Burkard R; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 3571722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2222-34. PubMed ID: 2269738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2526-36. PubMed ID: 2745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components.
    Gott PS; Hughes EC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 74(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 2465888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus.
    Burkard R; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1050-63. PubMed ID: 3571721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the effects of broadband masking noise on the auditory brainstem response in young and older adults.
    Burkard RF; Sims D
    Am J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 11(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 12227352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain-stem auditory-evoked responses elicited by maximum length sequences: effect of simultaneous masking noise.
    Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1665-72. PubMed ID: 2341670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forward masking of auditory nerve and brainstem responses using high-pass noise maskers.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 8(3):317-37. PubMed ID: 7153185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: restriction of frequency contribution by notched-noise masking.
    Folsom RC; Wynne MK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Oct; 80(4):1057-64. PubMed ID: 3771926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Will contralateral white noise interfere with the monaurally click-evoked brainstem response?
    Rosenhamer H; Holmkvist C
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 6844866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity.
    Eggermont JJ; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 7462466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of binaural interaction by the characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials in guinea pigs].
    Chudnovskiĭ SI; Moroz BS; Poliakov AN
    Neirofiziologiia; 1987; 19(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 3447058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses using notched noise masking.
    Oates PA; Purdy SC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):995-1009. PubMed ID: 11519624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The brain-stem auditory-evoked response in the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) to clicks and frequency-modulated sweeps.
    Burkard R; Moss CF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):801-10. PubMed ID: 7930082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain-stem responses when masking with wide-band and high-pass filtered noise.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G; Matkei P
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7323676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forward masking of auditory nerve (N1) and brainstem (wave V) responses in humans.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):795-803. PubMed ID: 7130538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.