BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6645468)

  • 1. Midfrequency dysfunction in listeners having high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 6645468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Alberti PW
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
    Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner C; Burns EM; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 6841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of high-frequency audiometry suitable for routine clinical use.
    Rendell RJ; Miller JJ
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6626785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 3819171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2314082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Preminger J; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 4010249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Houtsma AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):961-5. PubMed ID: 6841822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6747116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
    Arlinger S; Dryselius H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical considerations in the use of time-compressed speech.
    Grimes AM; Mueller HG; Williams DL
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 6724171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [From the expert's office: When is a hearing loss in the high tone range with coexisting hearing loss in all frequencies consequence of professional noise exposure? Frequent false evaluation of consultants, consulting physicians and professional unions].
    Brusis T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2015 Jan; 94(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 25569465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing normal hearing and hearing-impaired subject's performance on the Northwestern Auditory Test Number 6, California Consonant Test, and Pascoe's High-Frequency Word Test.
    Maroonroge S; Diefendorf AO
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 6510582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 1775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
    Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.