These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6645468)

  • 1. Midfrequency dysfunction in listeners having high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 6645468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Alberti PW
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
    Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner C; Burns EM; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 6841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of high-frequency audiometry suitable for routine clinical use.
    Rendell RJ; Miller JJ
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6626785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 3819171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2314082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Preminger J; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 4010249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Houtsma AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):961-5. PubMed ID: 6841822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6747116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
    Arlinger S; Dryselius H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical considerations in the use of time-compressed speech.
    Grimes AM; Mueller HG; Williams DL
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 6724171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [From the expert's office: When is a hearing loss in the high tone range with coexisting hearing loss in all frequencies consequence of professional noise exposure? Frequent false evaluation of consultants, consulting physicians and professional unions].
    Brusis T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2015 Jan; 94(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 25569465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing normal hearing and hearing-impaired subject's performance on the Northwestern Auditory Test Number 6, California Consonant Test, and Pascoe's High-Frequency Word Test.
    Maroonroge S; Diefendorf AO
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 6510582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 1775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
    Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.