271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6645468)
21. An analysis of psychophysical tuning curves in normal and pathological ears.
Carney AE; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):268-78. PubMed ID: 6826895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Mackersie CL; Prida TL; Stiles D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 44(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 11218102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Temporal integration, frequency resolution, and off-frequency listening in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
Hall JW; Fernandes MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1172-7. PubMed ID: 6643838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Brainstem response, speech and high-frequency audiometry.
Laukli E; Mair IW
Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 4059851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise.
Lyregaard PE
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.
Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Kincaid GE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 3584685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Masking and partial masking in listeners with a high-frequency hearing loss.
Smits JT; Duifhuis H
Audiology; 1982; 21(4):310-24. PubMed ID: 7103838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.
Baker RJ; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1330-9. PubMed ID: 11931310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
Nelson DA; Fortune TW
J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The 500 Hz masking-level difference and word recognition in multitalker babble for 40- to 89-year-old listeners with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss.
Wilson RH; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jun; 16(6):367-82. PubMed ID: 16178408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
Pavlovic CV
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1253-8. PubMed ID: 6725776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Further interpretation of the threshold of octave masking (TOM) test.
Olsen CC; Berry GA
Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):217-33. PubMed ID: 531475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [From the expert office: The medio-cochlear hearing loss in the noise worker].
Brusis T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Mar; 90(3):166-7. PubMed ID: 21380961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
Wilson RH; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
Festen JM; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
