These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6645483)

  • 1. Properties and interpretation of the Woolf and Scatchard plots in analysing data from steroid receptor assays.
    Keightley DD; Fisher RJ; Cressie NA
    J Steroid Biochem; 1983 Oct; 19(4):1407-12. PubMed ID: 6645483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysing data from hormone-receptor assays.
    Cressie NA; Keightley DD
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 7272412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Woolf plot is more reliable than the Scatchard plot in analysing data from hormone receptor assays.
    Keightley DD; Cressie NA
    J Steroid Biochem; 1980 Nov; 13(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 6256586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies on the cytosolic estrogen receptor from rat thymus.
    Morgan DD; Grossman CJ
    Thymus; 1985; 7(5):279-86. PubMed ID: 4060216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study on estradiol receptor assays in human breast cancer tissue.
    Mulder J; Verhaar MA
    Clin Chim Acta; 1979 Dec; 99(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 509736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple, low-cost computer program for Scatchard plot analysis of binding data in steroid hormone receptor assays.
    Kind G; Pollow K; Grill HJ; Manz B; Heubner A
    Exp Clin Endocrinol; 1985 Jun; 85(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 3840093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis and properties of the cytosolic estrogen receptor from rat thymus.
    Morgan DD; Grossman CJ
    Endocr Res; 1984; 10(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 6499786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The analysis of data from breast cancer estrogen and progesterone receptor assays: Scatchard plots are inferior to direct fitting by computer.
    Cooke RR; McIntosh JE
    Clin Chim Acta; 1986 Feb; 154(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 3955843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative characterization of hormone receptors.
    Rodbard D; Munson PJ; Thakur AK
    Cancer; 1980 Dec; 46(12 Suppl):2907-18. PubMed ID: 7448735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of systematic error on the shape of the scatchard plot of tRNAPhe binding to eukaryotic ribosomes.
    Nekhai SA; Beletzkij VE; Graifer DM
    Biochem J; 1997 Jul; 325 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):401-4. PubMed ID: 9230119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis on the slope of Scatchard plots.
    Henis YI; Levitzki A
    Eur J Biochem; 1976 Dec; 71(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 1009963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three radioligands compared for determining cytoplasmic estrogen-receptor content of human breast carcinomas.
    Pieslor PC; Gibson RE; Eckelman WC; Oates KK; Cook B; Reba RC
    Clin Chem; 1982 Mar; 28(3):532-7. PubMed ID: 7067100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of ligand heterogeneity on the Scatchard plot. Particular relevance to lipoprotein binding analysis.
    Mendel CM; Licko V; Kane JP
    J Biol Chem; 1985 Mar; 260(6):3451-5. PubMed ID: 2982861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assay of oestrogen and progestin receptors in human meningioma cytosols using immunological methods.
    Blankenstein MA; van der Meulen-Dijk C; Thijssen JH
    Clin Chim Acta; 1987 Jun; 165(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 3308181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Possible heterogeneity of cytoplasmic estrogen receptors].
    Alekseeva ML; Minina LS; Novikov EA; Shchedrina RN; Fanchenko ND
    Vopr Med Khim; 1984; 30(5):62-5. PubMed ID: 6528522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cooperativity on the determination of dissociation constants: examination of the Cheng-Prusoff equation, the Scatchard analysis, the Schild analysis and related power equations.
    Cheng HC
    Pharmacol Res; 2004 Jul; 50(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 15082026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplified Scatchard-plot assay for estrogen receptor in human breast tumor.
    Johnson RB; Nakamura RM; Libby RM
    Clin Chem; 1975 Nov; 21(12):1725-30. PubMed ID: 171099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation and analysis of receptor binding experiments which yield non-linear Scatchard plots and binding constants dependent upon receptor concentration.
    Pedersen JB; Lindup WE
    Biochem Pharmacol; 1994 Jan; 47(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 8304962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linearization of two ligand-one binding site scatchard plot and the "IC50" competitive inhibition plot: application to the simplified graphical determination of equilibrium constants.
    Gray HE; Luttge WG
    Life Sci; 1988; 42(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 3336278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization and quantitation of human hepatic estrogen receptor.
    Porter LE; Elm MS; Van Thiel DH; Dugas MC; Eagon PK
    Gastroenterology; 1983 Apr; 84(4):704-12. PubMed ID: 6825981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.