These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6646071)

  • 21. Measurements of multidetector CT surface dose distributions using a film dosimeter and chest phantom.
    Tominaga M; Kawataa Y; Niki N; Moriyama N; Yamada K; Ueno J; Nishitani H
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2467-78. PubMed ID: 21776782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scatter fractions in AMBER imaging.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):879-80. PubMed ID: 2244003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems.
    Samei E; Lo JY; Yoshizumi TT; Jesneck JL; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; McAdams HP; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 15845791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Photographic unsharp masking in chest radiography.
    Sorenson JA; Niklason LT; Nelson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 7275540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
    Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of geometric and screen-film unsharpness in conventional and 350-kVp chest radiography.
    Haus AG; Meyer J; North LB
    Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):197-202. PubMed ID: 7422845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exposure artifacts in raster scanned equalization radiography.
    Plewes DB; Vogelstein E
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 6727790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography.
    Vlasbloem H; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3420279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rare-earth scatter fractions in chest radiography.
    Petrone TJ; Steidley KD
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):475-9. PubMed ID: 8497240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of vertical cassette holder design and construction on scatter-to-primary radiation ratios.
    Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1981 Feb; 138(2):461-4. PubMed ID: 7455131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Jin JY; Ren L; Liu Q; Kim J; Wen N; Guan H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5634-44. PubMed ID: 21158275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Digital radiology. Clinical experience].
    Stacul F; Smathers RL
    Radiol Med; 1985 Nov; 71(11):732-9. PubMed ID: 4095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Grid versus air gap. A comparison of cephalometric techniques.
    Benson BW; Frederiksen NL; Goaz PW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 8108105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The effect of scattered radiation and tube focal size on the background density of x-ray pictures using an x-ray exposure system].
    Klein J; Zimny N
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 2343100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diode array digital radiography: initial clinical experience.
    Sashin D; Sternglass EJ; Slasky BS; Bron KM; Herron JM; Kennedy WH; Shabason L; Boyer J; Pollitt AE; Latchaw RE; Girdany BR; Simpson RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1045-50. PubMed ID: 6983247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.