These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6646176)

  • 1. The Baby Doe rules.
    N Engl J Med; 1983 Dec; 309(24):1517-8. PubMed ID: 6646176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Baby Doe rules.
    Heffernan BT
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Jan; 310(1):51. PubMed ID: 6689744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict.
    Berseth CL
    Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handicapped children: Baby Doe and Uncle Sam.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1983 Sep; 309(11):659-61. PubMed ID: 6225018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Baby Doe revisited.
    Norman ME
    Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 3569610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Checkmating the Baby Doe regulations.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Aug; 16(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 3744798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rejecting the Baby Doe rules and defending a "negative" analysis of the Best Interests Standard.
    Kopelman LM
    J Med Philos; 2005 Aug; 30(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16029986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The case of Baby Jane Doe: child abuse or unlawful Federal intervention?
    Annas GJ
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Jul; 74(7):727-9. PubMed ID: 6742262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 'Baby Doe' rule: is it all bad?
    Johnson DE; Thompson TR
    Pediatrics; 1984 May; 73(5):729-30. PubMed ID: 6718131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The American Academy of Pediatrics comments on the "Baby Doe II" regulations.
    Strain JE
    N Engl J Med; 1983 Aug; 309(7):443-4. PubMed ID: 6877312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prescriptions for Baby Doe.
    Stein J
    Natl J (Wash); 1983 May; 15(20):1021. PubMed ID: 10259832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perspectives. Baby Doe: HHS, Congress & the courts.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Aug; 37(30):4p. PubMed ID: 10262597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'Baby Doe' rule's successes told.
    Krieger L
    Am Med News; 1983 Aug; 26(30):1, 6. PubMed ID: 10264153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AHA files "Baby Doe" comments; criticizes proposed rule.
    Tomaselli LA; McCann RW
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Sep; 6(19):1-3. PubMed ID: 10262328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infanticide, physicians, and the law: the "Baby Doe" amendments to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act.
    Lund N
    Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 3832943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Baby Doe' thrusts administrators into middle of life-death decision.
    Punch L; Simler SL
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Jul; 12(7):72-4. PubMed ID: 10317219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An attempt to regulate medical decision making.
    Culliton BJ
    Clin Res; 1983 Oct; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 10263139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Committees, philosophers and Baby Doe.
    Zucker A; Annarino L
    Death Stud; 1985; 9(5-6):493-7. PubMed ID: 10275449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment.
    Britton JR
    West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The stormy legacy of Baby Doe.
    Wallis C; Constable A; Gribben S
    Time; 1983 Sep; 122(13):58. PubMed ID: 10262067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.