These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6646769)

  • 1. Stereopsis with spatially-degraded images.
    Wood IC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1983; 3(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 6646769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of stereopsis depends upon contrast sensitivity and spatial tuning.
    Schor CM
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Aug; 56(8):628-35. PubMed ID: 4031353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualizing the limits of low vision in detecting natural image features.
    Hogervorst MA; van Damme WJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 85(10):E951-62. PubMed ID: 18832970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of monocular refractive blur on gait parameters when negotiating a raised surface.
    Vale A; Scally A; Buckley JG; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Mar; 28(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 18339044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resolution for spatial segregation and spatial localization by motion signals.
    Burr D; McKee S; Morrone CM
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):932-9. PubMed ID: 16289200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of differences between eyes on binocular measures of vision in patients with cataracts.
    Comas M; Castells X; Acosta ER; Tuñí J
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun; 21(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 16518364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gait alterations negotiating a raised surface induced by monocular blur.
    Vale A; Buckley JG; Elliott DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1128-34. PubMed ID: 19050467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The aesthetic experience of 'contour binding'.
    Casco C; Guzzon D
    Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):291-314. PubMed ID: 18534105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings.
    Charman WN
    Br J Physiol Opt; 1979; 33(2):10-20. PubMed ID: 554724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast sensitivity of wildtype mice wearing diffusers or spectacle lenses, and the effect of atropine.
    Schmucker C; Schaeffel F
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):678-87. PubMed ID: 15993919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spherocylindrical refractive errors and visual acuity.
    Raasch TW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Apr; 72(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 7609953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of dioptric blur on Snellen and grating acuity.
    Thorn F; Schwartz F
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 2308749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of visual impairment and eye disease on vision-related quality of life in a Mexican-American population: proyecto VER.
    Broman AT; Munoz B; Rodriguez J; Sanchez R; Quigley HA; Klein R; Snyder R; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Nov; 43(11):3393-8. PubMed ID: 12407148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial scaling of the binocular capture effect.
    Raghunandan A; Anderson CS; Saladin JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unequal weighting of monocular inputs in binocular combination: implications for the compression of stereoscopic imagery.
    Meegan DV; Stelmach LB; Tam WJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 11477981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective broad-band spatial frequency loss in contrast sensitivity functions. Comparison with a model based on optical transfer functions.
    Bour LJ; Apkarian P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 37(12):2475-84. PubMed ID: 8933764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BVAT distance vs. near stereopsis screening of strabismus, strabismic amblyopia and refractive amblyopia; a prospective study of 68 patients.
    Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2000; 15(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 10960226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis.
    Schor CM; Wood IC; Ogawa J
    Vision Res; 1984; 24(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 6740978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monocular blur alters the tuning characteristics of stereopsis for spatial frequency and size.
    Li RW; So K; Wu TH; Craven AP; Tran TT; Gustafson KM; Levi DM
    R Soc Open Sci; 2016 Sep; 3(9):160273. PubMed ID: 27703690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.