These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6646952)
1. The creation and reversal of the Müller-Lyer illusion through attentional manipulation. Coren S; Porac C Perception; 1983; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 6646952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The many illusions of the Müller-Lyer: comparisons of the wings-in and wings-out illusions and manipulations of standard and dot forms. Greist-Bousquet S; Schiffman HR Perception; 1981; 10(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 7279543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective looking and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Goryo K; Robinson JO; Wilson JA Perception; 1984; 13(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 6543943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations. Nemati F Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Illusion decrement and transfer of illusion decrement in Müller-Lyer figures. Predebon J; Stevens K; Petocz A Perception; 1993; 22(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 8378130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of line-figure information on the magnitude of the dot forms of the Poggendorff and Müller-Lyer illusions. Predebon J Perception; 1986; 15(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 3822734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of the angle components in the wings-in and wings-out forms of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Predebon J Perception; 1996; 25(7):773-81. PubMed ID: 8923548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion. Davies TN; Spencer J Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 905080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Foster RM; Franz VH Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention and the Müller-Lyer illusion: simulation of an experiment by Larsen and Garn. Pressey AW; Kersten B Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Jun; 68(3 Pt 2):1323-9. PubMed ID: 2762095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assimilation theory, attentive fields, and the Müller-Lyer illusion. Bross M; Blair R; Longtin P Perception; 1978; 7(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 693229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but reduces the Müller-Lyer and orientation contrast illusions. Takao S; Watanabe K; Cavanagh P J Vis; 2021 Jun; 21(6):4. PubMed ID: 34110368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cylinder configuration: when is a distortion an illusion? Treisman M Perception; 1983; 12(5):581-7. PubMed ID: 6676708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Features of perception of length of segments under conditions of ponzo and Müller-Lyer illusions in schizophrenia]. Shoshina II; Perevozchikova IN; Konkina SA; Pronin SV; Shelepin IuE; Bendera AP Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2011; 61(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 22384730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of changes in fin-length on apparent shaft-length and depth in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Jaeger T Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1178436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of lightness contrast on the colored Müller-Lyer illusion. Pollack RH; Jaeger TB Percept Psychophys; 1991 Sep; 50(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 1754363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]