These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6646956)

  • 1. Individual variation in directional bias in visual perception.
    Annett M
    Perception; 1983; 12(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 6646956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lateral onset asynchrony in left-handers.
    Hatta T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Aug; 43(1):255-9. PubMed ID: 958820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetrical processing of tachistoscopic inputs in undergraduates across sex, handedness, field-side, and fixation instructions.
    Iaccino JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1203-13. PubMed ID: 2399095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cerebral asymmetries in random-dot stereopsis: reversal of direction with changes in dot size.
    Pitblado CB
    Perception; 1979; 8(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 530809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of the left-visual-field superiority in face perception appear at multiple stages of face processing.
    Yovel G; Levy J; Grabowecky M; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):462-74. PubMed ID: 12729496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normal-mirrored letter recognition, same-different judgment and cerebral dominance.
    Shimizu A; Endo M
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1982; 36(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 7095668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of perceptual quality and visual field of probe stimulus presentation on memory search for letters.
    Hellige JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):639-51. PubMed ID: 6449535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asynchrony of lateral onset as a factor in difference in visual field.
    Hatta T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):163-6. PubMed ID: 1256971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of laterality and visual angle on time judgments: a phenomenological investigation of time durations.
    Mandes E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Feb; 58(1):307-10. PubMed ID: 6718197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: an MEG analysis using virtual electrodes.
    Barca L; Cornelissen P; Simpson M; Urooj U; Woods W; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):53-71. PubMed ID: 20932563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration.
    Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemisphere specialization of Go experts in visuospatial processing.
    Hatta T; Kogure T; Kawakami A
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(4):571-84. PubMed ID: 10696267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of learning experience to the visual field advantage on random form recognition].
    Yoshizaki K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1988 Dec; 59(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 3244209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical scanning biases and their possible influence on reading direction: celtic wisdom or folly?
    Amengual AM; Drago V; Foster PS; Leiguarda RC; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jan; 14(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18078536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for scanning with unilateral visual presentation of letters.
    Tramer O; Butler BE; Mewhort DJ
    Brain Lang; 1985 May; 25(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 4027561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric asymmetry for processing unpronounceable and pronounceable letter trigrams.
    Eng TL; Hellige JB
    Brain Lang; 1994 May; 46(4):517-35. PubMed ID: 8044675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.