These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6646960)

  • 1. Choice reaction time with a random foreperiod.
    Green DM; Smith AF; von Gierke SM
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Sep; 34(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 6646960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task.
    Fletcher B; Rabbitt PM
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1978 Aug; 30(3):417-27. PubMed ID: 693787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of alcohol and practice on choice reaction time.
    Maylor EA; Rabbitt PM
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Nov; 42(5):465-75. PubMed ID: 3696941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Categorization time as independent of the number of condition-action rules.
    Liu IM
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Jan; 37(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 3991322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions.
    Smith EE
    Psychol Bull; 1968 Feb; 69(2):77-110. PubMed ID: 4867597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practice increases the efficiency of evidence accumulation in perceptual choice.
    Brown S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 15826231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic aftereffects in two-choice reaction time: a mathematical representation of some concepts.
    Soetens E; Deboeck M; Hueting J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Aug; 10(4):581-98. PubMed ID: 6235321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lengthening fixed preparatory foreperiod durations within a digit magnitude classification task serves mainly to shift distributions of response times upwards.
    Leth-Steensen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19041084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suppressing response initiation in a choice RT task.
    Buckolz E; Hall C; Alain C
    Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1982 Mar; 7(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 7094194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A New Foreperiod Effect on Intertrial Phase Coherence. Part I: Existence and Behavioral Relevance.
    Rapela J; Westerfield M; Townsend J
    Neural Comput; 2018 Sep; 30(9):2348-2383. PubMed ID: 29949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models for response time with different conclusions about psychological mechanisms?
    Heathcote A; Hayes B
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22686161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses.
    Ratcliff R
    Psychol Rev; 1985 Apr; 92(2):212-25. PubMed ID: 3991839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time to detect errors as a function of factors affecting choice-response time.
    Rabbitt P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1967; 27():131-42. PubMed ID: 6062204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time.
    DRAZIN DH
    J Exp Psychol; 1961 Jul; 62():43-50. PubMed ID: 13724295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response selection in spatial choice reaction: further evidence against associative models.
    Duncan J
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1978 Aug; 30(3):429-40. PubMed ID: 693788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Independence of reaction time and response force control during isometric leg extension.
    Fukushi T; Ohtsuki T
    J Sports Sci; 2004 Apr; 22(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 15161111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response selection in choice reaction time: test of a buffer model.
    Mewaldt SP; Connelly CL; Simon R
    Mem Cognit; 1980 Nov; 8(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 7219181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.