These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6646970)

  • 1. Relationships between the kinetic, alternating-line, and Poggendorff illusions: the effects of interstimulus interval, inducing parallels, and fixation.
    Wenderoth P; Johnson M
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Sep; 34(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 6646970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proprioceptive information neither improves fixation stability nor reduces autokinesis.
    Winterson BJ; Steinman RM
    Vision Res; 1979; 19(11):1289-91. PubMed ID: 550593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of OKN suppression by smooth pursuit for induced motion.
    Post RB; Shupert CL; Leibowitz HW
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Nov; 36(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 6533574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The perception of object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements: adjacency is not a factor contributing to the Filehne illusion.
    de Graaf B; Wertheim AH
    Vision Res; 1988; 28(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 3195058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Illusion of movement in ocular tracking movements].
    Lebedev DG; Surovicheva NS
    Biofizika; 1976; 21(5):923-6. PubMed ID: 1022255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A visual illusion of movement.
    de Jonge AB
    Vision Res; 1982; 22(11):1413. PubMed ID: 7157679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of maintained ocular deviation on the spatial displacement component of the oculogyral illusion.
    Evanoff JN; Lackner JR
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Jul; 42(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 3658634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The loss of position constancy during pursuit eye movements.
    Mack A; Herman E
    Vision Res; 1978; 18(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 664276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Entrained path deflection in apparent motion.
    Anstis S; Ramachandran VS
    Vision Res; 1986; 26(10):1731-9. PubMed ID: 3617514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flickering phantoms: a motion illusion without motion.
    Genter CR; Weisstein N
    Vision Res; 1981; 21(6):963-6. PubMed ID: 7314479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On Pulfrich-illusion eye movements and accommodation vergence during visual pursuit.
    Enright JT
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(11):1613-22. PubMed ID: 3832584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overshoot of curvature in visual apparent motion.
    Foster DH; Gravano S
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 May; 31(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 7110899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exorcising the double-nail illusion: giving up the ghost.
    Ono H
    Perception; 1984; 13(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 6543955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Pulfrich phenomenon with eye movement.
    Ono H; Steinbach MJ
    Vision Res; 1983; 23(12):1735-7. PubMed ID: 6666079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visually induced tilt affects form perception.
    McAdie PJ; Steinbach MJ
    Perception; 1981; 10(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 7339571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efference, perceived movement, and illusory displacement.
    Leibowitz HW; Post RB; Sheehy JB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1986 Dec; 63(1-3):23-34. PubMed ID: 3591434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interattribute apparent motion.
    Cavanagh P; Arguin M; von Grünau M
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(9):1197-204. PubMed ID: 2617865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between passively induced apparent movement and gaze direction.
    Hill AL
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Sep; 36(3):307. PubMed ID: 6522224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impressions of visual direction from extraocular afference.
    Hershberger W
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Apr; 35(4):400-1. PubMed ID: 6739276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bending the Poggendorff parallels and the rules of inference: a note on Brigell and Uhlarik (1980).
    Wenderoth P
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Mar; 29(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 7267281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.