These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6647703)

  • 1. The Carleton University responsiveness to suggest ion scale: stability,reliability, and relationships with expectancy and 'hypnotic experiences'.
    Spanos NP; Radtke HL; Hodgins DC; Bertrand LD; Stam HJ; Dubreuil DL
    Psychol Rep; 1983 Oct; 53(2):555-63. PubMed ID: 6647703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: relationship with other measures of hypnotic susceptibility, expectancies, and absorption.
    Spanos NP; Radtke HL; Hodgins DC; Bertrand LD; Stam HJ; Moretti P
    Psychol Rep; 1983 Dec; 53(3 Pt 1):723-34. PubMed ID: 6657830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Carleton University responsiveness to suggestion scale: normative data and psychometric properties.
    Spanos NP; Radtke HL; Hodgins DC; Stam HJ; Bertrand LD
    Psychol Rep; 1983 Oct; 53(2):523-35. PubMed ID: 6647700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of overt and subjective responses to the Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale under conditions of group administration.
    Spanos NP; Salas J; Menary EP; Brett PJ
    Psychol Rep; 1986 Jun; 58(3):847-56. PubMed ID: 3726039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding.
    Council JR; Kirsch I; Hafner LP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1986 Jan; 50(1):182-9. PubMed ID: 3701572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses.
    Barnes SM; Lynn SJ; Pekala RJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response expectancy as a mediator of hypnotizability modification: a brief communication.
    Gearan P; Kirsch I
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 8468105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hypnosis and the relationship between trance, suggestion, expectancy and depth: some semantic and conceptual issues.
    Wagstaff GF
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Jul; 53(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 20718242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The creative imagination scale as a measure of hypnotic responsiveness: applications to experimental and clinical hypnosis.
    Wilson SC; Barber TX
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1978 Apr; 20(4):235-49. PubMed ID: 665540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypnotic responsiveness: expectancy, attitudes, fantasy proneness, absorption, and gender.
    Green JP; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jan; 59(1):103-21. PubMed ID: 21104487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies.
    Meyer EC; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jul; 59(3):327-49. PubMed ID: 21644124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
    Kirsch I; Council JR; Wickless C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 2347668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The response set theory of hypnosis.
    Kirsch I
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2000; 42(3-4):274-92. PubMed ID: 10710811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hypnotic depth and hypnotic susceptibility: a replicated finding.
    Perry C; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1980 Jul; 28(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 7390667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MEASURING "HYPNOTIC-LIKE" SUGGESTIBILITY WITH AND WITHOUT "HYPNOTIC INDUCTION"; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES, NORMS, AND VARIABLES INFLUENCING RESPONSE TO THE BARBER SUGGESTIBILITY SCALE (BSS).
    BARBER TX
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Jun; 16():809-44. PubMed ID: 14303013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modifying hypnotic suggestibility with the Carleton Skills Training program.
    Bates BL; Miller RJ; Cross HJ; Brigham TA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Jul; 55(1):120-7. PubMed ID: 3418486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of expectancy in hypnotic hypermnesia: a brief communication.
    Grabowski KL; Roese NJ; Thomas MR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1991 Oct; 39(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1937989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A note of possible limitations on the use of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
    Levitt EE; Aronoff G; Morgan CD
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1974 Jul; 22(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 4847203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intentional and spontaneous imagery in hypnosis: the phenomenology of hypnotic responding.
    Comey G; Kirsch I
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1999 Jan; 47(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 9889488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Furnishing hypnotic instructions with implementation intentions enhances hypnotic responsiveness.
    Schweiger Gallo I; Pfau F; Gollwitzer PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):1023-30. PubMed ID: 22487594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.