These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6650705)

  • 1. Discriminative control of generalized effort.
    Eisenberger R; McDermitt M; Masterson FA; Over S
    Am J Psychol; 1983; 96(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 6650705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy versus speed in the generalized effort of learning-disabled children.
    Eisenberger R; Mitchell M; McDermitt M; Masterson FA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jul; 42(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 6481298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of conceptual task difficulty on generalized persistence.
    Eisenberger R; Leonard JM
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Jun; 93(2):285-98. PubMed ID: 7406069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of persistence across behaviors.
    Eisenberger R; Heerdt WA; Hamdi M; Zimet S; Bruckmeir G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1979 Sep; 5(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 528917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):36-69. PubMed ID: 16478315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Second-order contrast based on the expectation of effort and reinforcement.
    Clement TS; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Jan; 28(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 11868235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers.
    Attwood AS; O'Sullivan H; Leonards U; Mackintosh B; Munafò MR
    Addiction; 2008 Nov; 103(11):1875-82. PubMed ID: 19032536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emergent simple discrimination in children: preference for non-preferred stimuli.
    Smeets PM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1993 Nov; 46(4):321-43. PubMed ID: 8272524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scratch and match: pigeons learn matching and oddity with gravel stimuli.
    Wright AA; Delius JD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan; 20(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 8308488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects.
    Jamieson JP; Harkins SG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Oct; 93(4):544-64. PubMed ID: 17892331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Employing computer technology to assess visual attention in young children and adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 May; 65(2):141-70. PubMed ID: 9169208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of the electrophysiological correlates of retrieval cue processing by the specificity of task demands.
    Johnson JD; Rugg MD
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1071(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 16413511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generalization of non-linguistic auditory perceptual training to syllable discrimination.
    Lakshminarayanan K; Tallal P
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):263-72. PubMed ID: 17943004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative use of proximity, shape similarity, and orientation as visual perceptual grouping cues in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Spinozzi G; De Lillo C; Truppa V; Castorina G
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Feb; 123(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 19236145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus functions in response chaining.
    Thvedt JE; Zane T; Walls RT
    Am J Ment Defic; 1984 May; 88(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 6742003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia).
    Colombo M; Cottle A; Frost N
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 14498800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual control in discrimination reversal learning.
    Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 17044746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.