101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 665204)
1. Speech pure tone audiometry as a screen for exaggerated hearing loss in industrial claims.
Alberti PW; Morgan PP; Czuba I
Acta Otolaryngol; 1978; 85(5-6):328-31. PubMed ID: 665204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Study the impacts of diagnosis on occupational noise-induced deafness after bring into the different high frequency hearing threshold weighted value].
Xue LJ; Yang AC; Chen H; Huang WX; Guo JJ; Liang XY; Chen ZQ; Zheng QL
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 35(11):812-817. PubMed ID: 29316750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise.
Quist-Hanssen S; Thorud E; Aasand G
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():90-5. PubMed ID: 287364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Agreement between auditory threshold calculated from cortical evoked response audiometry and tone audiometry in occupational hearing loss].
Janisch R; Jerábek J
Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 39(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 2289246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
Smoorenburg GF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exaggerated hearing loss in compensation claimants.
Alberti PW; Hyde ML; Riko K
J Otolaryngol; 1987 Dec; 16(6):362-6. PubMed ID: 2961891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Determination of hearing loss and disability assessment from pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in occupational noise-induced hearing loss].
Brusis T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):732-8. PubMed ID: 9081278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and validity of industrial audiometry: implications for hearing conservation program design.
Dobie RA
Laryngoscope; 1983 Jul; 93(7):906-27. PubMed ID: 6865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 23772828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Puretone threshold estimation from acoustic reflex thresholds--a myth?
Hyde ML; Alberti PW; Morgan PP; Symons F; Cummings F
Acta Otolaryngol; 1980; 89(3-4):345-57. PubMed ID: 7395504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical evoked response audiometry thresholds and neuroleptic, sedative, hypnotic drugs.
Dejonckere PH; Lebacq J; Coryn C
Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 14689614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Work-related, noise-induced hearing loss: evaluation including evoked potential audiometry.
Barrs DM; Althoff LK; Krueger WW; Olsson JE
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Feb; 110(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 8108153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audiologic characteristics in a sample of recently-separated military Veterans: The Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study (NOISE Study).
Gordon JS; Griest SE; Thielman EJ; Carlson KF; Helt WJ; Lewis MS; Blankenship C; Austin D; Theodoroff SM; Henry JA
Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():21-30. PubMed ID: 27913314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and pure tone audiometry in occupational screening for auditory deficit due to noise exposure.
Wooles N; Mulheran M; Bray P; Brewster M; Banerjee AR
J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Dec; 129(12):1174-81. PubMed ID: 26549131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of hearTest Smartphone-Based Audiometry for Hearing Screening in Workers Exposed to Noise.
Rodrigues LC; Ferrite S; Corona AP
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Feb; 32(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 33296933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
