These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6652049)

  • 1. Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps delivery.
    Vacca A; Grant A; Wyatt G; Chalmers I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Dec; 90(12):1107-12. PubMed ID: 6652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial.
    Johanson R; Pusey J; Livera N; Jones P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 May; 96(5):537-44. PubMed ID: 2667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing between bad, worse and worst: what is the preferred mode of delivery for failure of the second stage of labor?
    Hendler I; Kirshenbaum M; Barg M; Kees S; Mazaki-Tovi S; Moran O; Kalter A; Schiff E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(15):1861-1864. PubMed ID: 27550831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Operative Delivery From a Low Station in the Second Stage of Labor.
    Halscott TL; Reddy UM; Landy HJ; Ramsey PS; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Grantz KL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 26551186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal and maternal effects of forceps and vacuum extraction.
    Punnonen R; Aro P; Kuukankorpi A; Pystynen P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Nov; 93(11):1132-5. PubMed ID: 3778846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [How to proceed after a failed vacuum delivery].
    Chamagne M; Perdriolle-Galet E; Baumann C; Morel O
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Oct; 47(10):718-725. PubMed ID: 31121316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Forceps and Vacuum Delivery at Outlet, Low, and Midpelvic Station.
    Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Lisonkova S; Skoll A; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Mar; 41(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 30366887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neonatal and maternal outcome in low-pelvic and midpelvic operative deliveries.
    Robertson PA; Laros RK; Zhao RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1436-42; discussion 1442-4. PubMed ID: 2360576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
    Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Lurie S; Sadan O; Golan A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):426-7; author reply 427. PubMed ID: 16449136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & Ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496.
    Ramphul M; Kennelly MM; Burke G; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 25414081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vacuum extraction and forceps delivery in a district hospital.
    Carter J; Gudgeon CW
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 May; 27(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 3499889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury.
    Towner D; Castro MA; Eby-Wilkens E; Gilbert WM
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Dec; 341(23):1709-14. PubMed ID: 10580069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Boonrangsimant P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 3401434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.